Reconceptualizing co-rumination: A novel theoretical and multidisciplinary perspective [0.03%]
重新构思共思考：一种新颖的理论和跨学科视角
Ana M DiGiovanni,Ashley Tudder,Brett J Peters
Ana M DiGiovanni
Co-rumination is a social emotion regulation strategy characterized by extensive and exhaustive discussions of stressors, problems, and negative emotions with another person. While research establishing the costs and benefits associated wit...
A diffusion-based framework for modeling systematic, time-varying cognitive processes [0.03%]
一种基于扩散的建模系统性、时变认知过程的框架
Manikya Alister,Nathan J Evans
Manikya Alister
As people engage in tasks over extended periods, their psychological states change systematically due to factors such as practice, learning, and/or boredom. However, the dominant frameworks for modeling cognitive processes, such as evidence...
Morbid curiosity as an adapted motivation to explore ambiguous but survival-relevant stimuli [0.03%]
探究生死攸关的模棱两可刺激的适应性动机——病态的好奇心
David S March
David S March
Morbid curiosity, or the seemingly paradoxical drive to engage with aversive or grotesque stimuli, has long puzzled psychologists, who have traditionally framed it as either a form of sensation-seeking or a mechanism for unambiguous threat ...
Jennifer S Trueblood,Yanjun Liu,Matthew Murrow et al.
Jennifer S Trueblood et al.
Context effects in multialternative, multiattribute choice are pervasive and yet, paradoxically, elusive at the same time. For example, simple changes to the spatial layout of alternatives on the screen can nullify or reverse the effects. D...
Kevin J Lande,E J Green
Kevin J Lande
How much of what we see is imagined? Perception is a constructive process, supplementing the information available in sensory inputs to build representations of the world, as when one perceives a cat behind a chain-link fence as a whole, in...
Modeling speed-accuracy trade-offs in the stopping rule for confidence judgments [0.03%]
自信判断停止规则的速度精度权衡的建模
Stef Herregods,Pierre Le Denmat,Luc Vermeylen et al.
Stef Herregods et al.
Making a decision and reporting your confidence in the accuracy of that decision are thought to be driven by the same mechanism: the accumulation of evidence. It is well known that choices and reaction times are well accounted for by a comp...
In defense of the double empathy problem hypothesis: An urgently needed alternative to fallacies and injustices in mainstream autism research [0.03%]
捍卫双倍共情问题假说：主流自闭症研究中的谬论和不公亟需替代方案
Caroline Bollen,Janna van Grunsven
Caroline Bollen
In their theoretical note, "The Double Empathy Problem: A Derivation Chain Analysis and Cautionary Note," Livingston et al. (2024) took a critical look at the double empathy problem hypothesis (DEPH). While they acknowledge that the DEPH of...
Alejandro Pérez Velilla,Bret Beheim,Paul E Smaldino
Alejandro Pérez Velilla
We use cultural evolutionary models to examine how individual experiences and culturally inherited information jointly shape risk-taking behavior under environmental uncertainty. We find that learning processes not only generate considerabl...
Bounded rationalization: The role of acceptance in postchoice and postassignment rationalization [0.03%]
有限理性化：接受在选择后和分配后的合理性作用的影响
Kurt P Munz,Adam Eric Greenberg,Vicki G Morwitz
Kurt P Munz
People often rationalize their choices, reassessing selected options as more positive after choosing them. This article proposes that this type of rationalization does not arise from the act or self-perception of choosing (as previously tho...
A global matching model of choice and response times in the Deese-Roediger-Mcdermott semantic and structural false recognition paradigms [0.03%]
Deese-Roediger-McDermott虚假记忆范式的语义和结构虚假识别的全局匹配选择和反应时模型
Adam F Osth,Lyulei Zhang,Samuel Williams
Adam F Osth
One of the most common method of eliciting false memories in the laboratory is the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995), where participants study a set of items that are all similar to a nonpresented c...