Guido Melchior
Guido Melchior
That bootstrapping and Moorean reasoning fail to instantiate persuasive argumentation is an often informally presented but not systematically developed view. In this paper, I will argue that this unpersuasiveness is not determined by princi...
James B Freeman
James B Freeman
One takes one's word that p when a source vouches for p and one accepts the word of that source. If the source is reliable in this case, p is acceptable. The reliability of the source is a measure of its plausibility. If a source has the re...
Hans V Hansen
Hans V Hansen
This appearance condition of fallacies refers to the phenomenon of weak arguments, or moves in argumentation, appearing to be okay when really they aren't. Not all theorists agree that the appearance condition should be part of the concepti...
Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Catarina Dutilh Novaes
In this paper, I highlight the significance of practices of refutation in philosophical inquiry, that is, practices of showing that a claim, person or theory is wrong. I present and contrast two prominent approaches to philosophical refutat...
Twitter Activists' Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion [0.03%]
推特活动家通过子讨论进行论说：围绕可持续时尚争议的理论、方法及阐释
Sara Greco
Sara Greco
"Why are millions of dollars worth of orders being left unpaid?". With tweets like this questioning brands' policies, activists advocating for sustainable fashion re-discuss material starting points that are assumed by fashion brands, who a...
Bothsiderism [0.03%]
中间路线主义
Scott F Aikin,John P Casey
Scott F Aikin
This paper offers an account of a fallacy we will call bothsiderism, which is to mistake disagreement on an issue for evidence that either a compromise on, suspension of judgment regarding, or continued discussion of the issue is in order. ...
Annotating Argument Schemes [0.03%]
论据注释方案标注
Jacky Visser,John Lawrence,Chris Reed et al.
Jacky Visser et al.
Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluat...
Prins Marcus Valiant Lantz
Prins Marcus Valiant Lantz
This paper explores the interrelations between temporality and emotion in rhetorical argumentation. It argues that in situations of uncertainty argumentation affects action via appeals that invoke emotion and thereby translate the distant p...