Katherine Cheung,Rebecca Ehrenkranz,Brian D Earp et al.
Katherine Cheung et al.
A number of proposals across different fields have suggested incorporating "independent" actors into the research process as a way to manage potential bias. For example, in response to allegations of bias in psychedelic science, some have s...
Low awareness, informal channels: How LIS researchers perceive retracted papers and its implications for research integrity [0.03%]
意识低下，非正式渠道：图书馆学家如何看待论文撤稿及其对科研诚信的影响
Liu Yiru,Liu Yi,Yuan Zihan
Liu Yiru
Purpose/significance: This study investigates the awareness, perceptions, and responses of library and information science (LIS) researchers toward retracted papers, aiming to inform the improvement of research integrity ...
Lili Yang,Jiamin Lv,Jufang Shao et al.
Lili Yang et al.
Background: Failure to declare a conflict of interest (COI) may bias research outcomes and undermine the integrity of readers' decision-making. This study aims to examine common practices in health sciences where COIs wer...
Guidelines needed for the use of AI in the preparation or review of IRB, IBC, and IACUC applications [0.03%]
关于在IRB、IBC和IACUC申请的准备或审查中使用AI的指导原则
Mohammad Hosseini,Daniel Eisenman,James Riddle et al.
Mohammad Hosseini et al.
Three oversight bodies review research proposals to help ensure the safe and responsible conduct of biomedical research, each focusing on unique aspects of research ethics: institutional review boards (IRBs), institutional biosafety committ...
Research prioritization and societal accountability in corporatised healthcare services - What can Responsible Innovation offer? [0.03%]
市场化医疗服务中的研究优先级和社会问责制——责任创新能提供哪些帮助？
Siun Gallagher,Sara Attinger,Ian Kerridge et al.
Siun Gallagher et al.
In many parts of the world, an increasing number of clinical healthcare services are delivered through corporations. These corporations are also increasingly required to shape and undertake vital medical research. In this paper we outline t...
Opening Pandora's box: Developing reviewer rhetorical sensitivity through retracted articles [0.03%]
打开潘多拉的盒子：通过撤稿文章提高审稿人的修辞敏感度
Baraa Khuder
Baraa Khuder
Retractions issued for misconduct offer a unique window into how questionable research is rhetorically constructed and made to appear credible. This study investigates how engaging with retracted articles can serve as a pedagogical tool for...
Commercial funding of randomized controlled trials of weight-loss interventions using dietary supplements: A rapid review [0.03%]
膳食补充剂减肥干预的随机对照试验的商业资助：快速回顾
Jill R Kavanaugh,Abigail J Bulens,Julia A Vitagliano et al.
Jill R Kavanaugh et al.
Background: Nutrition research funded by commercial entities may be subject to bias. To date, no study has examined the prevalence of commercial funding in clinical trials of dietary supplements for weight loss. ...
Toward an "ecosystems" approach to responsible conduct of research (RCR): A multi-stakeholder framework for collaborative accountability and policy recommendations on research integrity [0.03%]
面向负责任研究行为的“生态系统”方法——合作问责制的多利益攸关方框架及科研诚信政策建议
Rockwell F Clancy,Lisa M Lee,Qin Zhu et al.
Rockwell F Clancy et al.
Background: Initiatives in responsible conduct of research (RCR) have often been ineffective, since they are based on several problematic assumptions. These include that (1) integrity issues in biomedical research serve a...
Conflict of Interest and financial disclosure policies of journals that publish weather and climate research [0.03%]
发布天气和气候研究期刊的争议利益和财务披露政策
Jessica Weinkle,Esika Savsani,Elise Colby et al.
Jessica Weinkle et al.
Weather and climate research is an area of science in which private companies, government agencies, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have substantial interests at stake, but little is known about how academic journals address these...
Rethinking (un)blinding in biomedical proposal peer review: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study [0.03%]
一种利益相关者定性研究：(不)设盲的生物医学提案同行评审的新思考
Seba Qussini,Farizah Mezer Anami,Kris Dierickx
Seba Qussini
Background: Many peer review attributes are widely criticized and poorly investigated, particularly in the context of proposals' peer review. This study aims to explore stakeholders' perspectives on the role of (un)blindi...