Distinguishing Contributor Listing from acknowledgments: Preserving the human dimension of scholarly recognition [0.03%]
区分贡献者列表和致谢：保留学术认可的人文维度
Yana Suchikova
Yana Suchikova
Holcombe et al. (2026) propose practical mechanisms for making specific non-author research contributions more visible through ORCID identifiers, CRediT information, manuscript submission systems, and JATS-XML metadata. We support this aim ...
Promoting equitable research: What Greenland teaches us about research ethics [0.03%]
促进公平研究：格陵兰教给我们的关于研究伦理的启示
Kristen Intemann,Gitte Adler Reimer,Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen et al.
Kristen Intemann et al.
Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) is increasingly becoming a site for international research to examine global climate change, biodiversity, deposits of rare earth elements, and various existing health disparities. Yet, there is no comprehensive...
Correction [0.03%]
改正
Published Erratum
Accountability in research. 2026 Jul 31:2710539. DOI:10.1080/08989621.2026.2710539 2026
Correction [0.03%]
改正
Published Erratum
Accountability in research. 2026 Jun 19:2691609. DOI:10.1080/08989621.2026.2691609 2026
Development, validity, and reliability of the pre-attendance conference evaluator (PACE) tool for identifying predatory conferences [0.03%]
用于识别掠夺性会议的预参会评估器(PACE)工具的发展、有效性和可靠性
Balraj Shukla,Maulee Sheth,Jina Jani et al.
Balraj Shukla et al.
Background: Predatory conferences (PCs) scam researchers by compromising them financially and professionally. This study presents the empirical development of the Pre-Attendance Conference Evaluator (PACE) to help academi...
Managing manuscripts with potential dual-use research of concern: A thematic analysis of life science journal policies [0.03%]
潜在具有关注的双用途研究的手稿管理：生命科学期刊政策的主题分析
Christopher A Bobier,Abraham Hamadi,Sydne Price et al.
Christopher A Bobier et al.
Background: Dual-use research of concern (DURC) refers to legitimate scientific research that, if misapplied, could cause significant harm. Journal editors play an important role in ensuring that disseminated research doe...
David Mills,Sefika Mertkan
David Mills
Should the methodological tools and review protocols required of biomedical researchers become the default for social science meta-researchers? And should these reporoducibility standards then be used to gatekeep and police "methodological ...
Accountability in evidence syntheses: On the need for rigorous peer review and reporting guidelines [0.03%]
证据综合中的责任问题——严谨同行评议与报告指南的重要性不容忽视
Caitlin Bakker,Melissa L Rethlefsen,Will White et al.
Caitlin Bakker et al.
It is an unfortunate reality that metascience and metaresearch are not immune to methodological or reporting issues. Best practices for conducting and reporting evidence syntheses are well-established, and we expect them to be enforced by t...
Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? - A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policies [0.03%]
组织机构科研诚信政策效力调查——兼论科研不端行为的共同责任
Simon Fuglsang,Serge P J M Horbach,Mads P Sørensen et al.
Simon Fuglsang et al.
Background: In response to widespread concerns about research integrity, recent years have seen numerous efforts to safeguard against research misconduct and questionable research practices. Research-performing organizati...
Alex O Holcombe,Rasmus Pedersen,Malgorzata Lagisz et al.
Alex O Holcombe et al.
Formal recognition of research contributions is critical for career advancement and the allocation of research funding. However, some contributions are mentioned only in the acknowledgments section, which are not indexed by scholarly databa...