Optimizing project management using no-code automation via Microsoft Power Automate®: a systematic review team case study [0.03%]
利用Microsoft Power Automate进行无代码自动化以优化项目管理的系统性回顾团队案例研究
Emily P Jones,Carrie Baldwin-SoRelle
Emily P Jones
Libraries with systematic review services rely on technology, often selected based on institutional subscriptions, for internal communication and data collection. Many libraries rely on manual data entry despite available no- or low-code so...
Osteoevidence: A User-Centric Database for Advancing Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine [0.03%]
骨证据：一种以用户为中心的数据库在促进手法医学中的应用与发展
Alberto Pollesel,Giacomo Pollesel,Aine Petrulaityte
Alberto Pollesel
Osteopathic practitioners and researchers face a scarcity of readily accessible scientific literature that bridges evidence-based research with clinical practice. Additionally, there is an absence of libraries specifically dedicated to oste...
An exploration of the impact of educational background on basic science and life sciences librarians [0.03%]
探讨教育背景对基础科学和生命科学图书馆员的影响
Laura Lipke,Margaret A Hoogland,Jeremy Kupsco et al.
Laura Lipke et al.
This study sought to investigate the influence of a science educational background on librarian interactions with basic and life sciences programs. Through semi-structured interviews with 14 librarians, the study identified several key them...
Really Simple Syndication (RSS) - Still Really Simple and Really Useful [0.03%]
真的简单聚合(RSS)-依旧真的很简单和很有用
Esther Garcia,Lisa Zarrella
Esther Garcia
This column reintroduces Really Simple Syndication (RSS). RSS feeds offer a structured way to receive updates from journals, databases like PubMed and Ovid, and websites. Librarians and researchers can use it to keep track of field trends a...
Comparing the performance of librarians and medical specialists in retrieving clinical evidence: an observational study [0.03%]
关于临床证据检索中医学专家和图书馆员表现的对比观察研究
Amaneh Dadashi,Vahideh Zarea Gavgani,Sakineh Hajebrahimi et al.
Amaneh Dadashi et al.
Access to precise and reliable scientific evidence is one of the fundamental principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in clinical decision-making processes. Medical librarians, by employing advanced search and information retrieval techn...
Gender Trends in Medical and Health Sciences Libraries, 2013-2024 [0.03%]
2013年至2024年的医学和健康科学图书馆的性别趋势
David Petersen
David Petersen
This column explores gender trends over the past decade in medical and health sciences libraries through data reported from the Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries (AAHSL) and Association of Research Libraries' (ARL) salary su...
Trends in Medical and Health Sciences Librarianship: A Comparative Analysis of Job Postings, Salary and Geographic Location, 2022 - 2024 [0.03%]
医学与健康科学图书馆学的发展趋势：职位招聘、薪酬和地理位置的比较分析（2022-2024）
David Petersen,Emily Harris
David Petersen
Job postings for medical and health sciences librarians provide valuable data for those seeking a better understanding of the evolving field of librarianship. Our data indicate a decrease in the number of postings from 2022 to 2024, a modes...
A toolkit for academic libraries to create interdisciplinary interest in the All of Us Researcher Workbench across campus communities [0.03%]
学术图书馆制作的工具包，用于在校园社区内激发对“所有人的研究工作台”的跨学科学术兴趣
Kristi Sadowski,DeBran Tarver,Jennifer Burnette et al.
Kristi Sadowski et al.
As part of the All of Us Data Training and Engagement for Academic Libraries Program, a toolkit was created to provide resources for academic librarians to increase library visibility and research capacity. The toolkit, created from program...
Constructing Patient Resources Keeping Literacy and Readability in Mind [0.03%]
构建患者资源时需考虑读写能力与可读性问题
Helen-Ann Brown Epstein
Helen-Ann Brown Epstein
Librarians build health literacy, beginning with a focus on literacy and information literacy and moving to health literacy for different age and ethnic groups, and levels of literacy groups. Today with media, librarians have concern for th...
Effect of Citation Numbers and Team Members on the Possibility of and Time Needed to Complete Screening for Systematic and Scoping Reviews [0.03%]
引用数量和团队成员对系统评价和范围评价的筛选完成可能性和所需时间的影响
E Barrett-Catton,E P Jones,R B Carlson
E Barrett-Catton
Covidence is a tool that facilitates systematic review screening. Librarians obtained Covidence review data from a large research institution to identify the effect that the total number of citations, team members, and librarian collaborati...