Explaining mobilization for revolts by private interests and kinship relations. A response to the comment by Nieva [0.03%]
私人利益和亲属关系视角下的动乱动员研究——对Nieva一文的回应
Niccolò Giorgio Armandola,Malte Doehne,Katja Rost
Niccolò Giorgio Armandola
We appreciate Ricardo Nieva's thoughtful engagement with our paper and his proposal to interpret our case study through the lens of his theoretical framework. Indeed, we noted the potential of such a connection in the original paper, and th...
Explaining mobilization for revolts by private interests and kinship relations [0.03%]
私人利益和亲属关系视角下的叛乱动员研究
Niccolò G Armandola,Malte Doehne,Katja Rost
Niccolò G Armandola
Mobilization for revolts poses a significant challenge for rational choice theory because revolts are vulnerable to free-riding, which disincentivizes rational actors from mobilizing. Strong, informal relations such as kinship ties have bee...
Regulation and state capacity [0.03%]
监管及国家能力
Arjun Chowdhury
Arjun Chowdhury
While one might expect states with low capacity to regulate less than states with high capacity, this is not supported by evidence, leaving open the possibility of rent-seeking. I use the example of the regulation of witchcraft in parts of ...
Septer, T. J.; Dijkstra, J.; Stokman et al.
Septer et al.
Corten, R.; Knecht, A.
Corten
Iriberri, N.; Uriarte, J.-R.
Iriberri
Emergent cultural signatures and persistent diversity: A model of conformity and consistency [0.03%]
Bednar, J.; Bramson, A.; Jones-Rooy et al.
Bednar et al.
Harrell, A.
Harrell
Frey, B. S.; Savage, D. A.; Torgler et al.
Frey et al.