Generative AI can and should accelerate research evaluation reform to better recognize 'distinctly human contributions' [0.03%]
生成式AI能够也应当加速研究评估改革，以更好地认可“独具人类特色的贡献”
Mohammad Hosseini,Brian D Earp,Sebastian Porsdam Mann et al.
Mohammad Hosseini et al.
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) revolutionizes how research is conducted, it also challenges traditional methods of scholarly evaluation. Productivity metrics such as publication and citation counts are widely understood to be...
Targeted, actionable and fair: Reviewer reports as feedback and its effect on ECR career choices [0.03%]
目标明确、可操作且公平：评审报告作为反馈及其对青年研究人员职业选择的影响
Gemma Elizabeth Derrick,Alessandra Zimmermann,Helen Greaves et al.
Gemma Elizabeth Derrick et al.
Previous studies of the use of peer review for the allocation of competitive funding agencies have concentrated on questions of efficiency and how to make the 'best' decision, by ensuring that successful applicants are also the more product...
Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation [0.03%]
描述研究网络的状态：一种混合方法的网络评价方法
James M Bowen,Mathieu Ouimet,Justin Lawarée et al.
James M Bowen et al.
Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach ...
Evaluating the Revised National Institutes of Health Clinical Trial Definition Impact on Recruitment Progress [0.03%]
美国国立卫生研究院临床试验定义修订版对招募进展的影响评估
Eugene I Kane rd,Gail L Daumit,Kevin M Fain et al.
Eugene I Kane rd et al.
Background: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a revised, expanded definition of "clinical trial" in 2014 to improve trial identification and administrative compliance. Some stakeholders voiced concerns tha...
Transdisciplinary research outcomes based on the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer II initiative experience [0.03%]
基于“肿瘤能量学跨学科研究II计划”的跨学科研究成果
Sarah D Hohl,Sarah Knerr,Sarah Gehlert et al.
Sarah D Hohl et al.
Intractable public health problems are influenced by interacting multi-level factors. Dynamic research approaches in which teams of scientists collaborate beyond traditional disciplinary, institutional, and geographic boundaries have emerge...
A framework for coordination center responsibilities and performance in a multi-site, transdisciplinary public health research initiative [0.03%]
多场地跨学科公共卫生研究计划中的协调中心职责与绩效框架
Sarah D Hohl,Sarah Knerr,Beti Thompson
Sarah D Hohl
Funding bodies in the USA and abroad are increasingly investing in transdisciplinary research, i.e. research conducted by investigators from different disciplines who work to create novel theoretical, methodological, and translational innov...
Comparing modeling approaches for assessing priorities in international agricultural research [0.03%]
比较国际农业研究优先性的评估模型方法
Athanasios Petsakos,Guy Hareau,Ulrich Kleinwechter et al.
Athanasios Petsakos et al.
This article examines how the estimated impacts of crop technologies vary with alternate methods and assumptions, and also discusses the implications of these differences for the design of studies to inform research prioritization. Drawing ...
An evaluation of the National Institutes of Health Early Stage Investigator policy: Using existing data to evaluate federal policy [0.03%]
利用现有数据评估联邦政策：对美国国立卫生研究院早期阶段调查员政策的评价
Rachael Walsh,Robert F Moore,Jamie Mihoko Doyle
Rachael Walsh
To assist new scientists in the transition to independent research careers, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) implemented an Early Stage Investigator (ESI) policy beginning with applications submitted in 2009. During the review proces...
'Your comments are meaner than your score': score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review [0.03%]
“您的评论比分数更刻薄”：得分校准谈话影响科学基金同行评议的组内和组间变异度
Elizabeth L Pier,Joshua Raclaw,Anna Kaatz et al.
Elizabeth L Pier et al.
In scientific grant peer review, groups of expert scientists meet to engage in the collaborative decision-making task of evaluating and scoring grant applications. Prior research on grant peer review has established that inter-reviewer reli...
Measuring the evolution and output of cross-disciplinary collaborations within the NCI Physical Sciences-Oncology Centers Network [0.03%]
测量NCI物理科学-肿瘤学中心网络内部跨学科合作的演变和成果
Jodi E Basner,Katrina I Theisz,Unni S Jensen et al.
Jodi E Basner et al.
Development of effective quantitative indicators and methodologies to assess the outcomes of cross-disciplinary collaborative initiatives has the potential to improve scientific program management and scientific output. This article highlig...