Agata Piękniewska,Laurel L Haak,Darla Henderson et al.
Agata Piękniewska et al.
Funders, publishers, scholarly societies, universities, and other stakeholders need to be able to track the impact of programs and policies designed to advance data sharing and reuse. With the launch of the NIH data management and sharing p...
Special Issues: The roles of special issues in scholarly communication in a changing publishing landscape [0.03%]
特刊的多重角色：变动出版格局中学术交流的形式与内容
Robyn M Gleasner,Akshay Sood
Robyn M Gleasner
This paper aims to enhance the understanding of the role of special issues in the evolving landscape of academic publishing, offering insights for publishers, editors, guest editors, and researchers, including how new technologies influence...
Ludo Waltman,Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner,Stephen Pinfield et al.
Ludo Waltman et al.
Peer review plays an essential role as one of the cornerstones of the scholarly publishing system. There are many initiatives that aim to improve the way in which peer review is organized, resulting in a highly complex landscape of innovati...
Publication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect? [0.03%]
新冠疫情期间的出版实践：加速出版还是抢先效应？
Yulia V Sevryugina,Andrew J Dicks
Yulia V Sevryugina
This study explores the evolution of publication practices associated with the SARS-CoV-2 research papers, namely, peer-reviewed journal and review articles indexed in PubMed and their associated preprints posted on bioRxiv and medRxiv serv...
The importance of effective data sharing and reuse to funders and others supporting research [0.03%]
有效数据共享和重复利用对于研究资助者和其他研究支持机构的重要性
Aki MacFarlane
Aki MacFarlane
Over-promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID-19 crisis [0.03%]
COVID-19危机期间预印本的摘要中过度宣传和谨慎的问题
Frederique Bordignon,Liana Ermakova,Marianne Noel
Frederique Bordignon
The abstract is known to be a promotional genre where researchers tend to exaggerate the benefit of their research and use a promotional discourse to catch the reader's attention. The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted intensive research and ha...
COVID-19 Rapid Review cross-publisher initiative: What we have learned and what we are going to do next [0.03%]
“新冠肺炎研究快速评审”跨出版商行动：我们已经了解到的情况以及今后的计划
Phil Hurst,Sarah Greaves
Phil Hurst
The global crisis sparked collaboration between publishers and service providers to successfully address an immediate problem and demonstrated the possibility for future partnerships.Encouraging experts to join a reviewer pool and quickly r...
Evolution of scientific collaboration on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis [0.03%]
基于冠状病毒疾病国际科研合作的文献计量分析
Dezhong Duan,Qifan Xia
Dezhong Duan
This paper considers the pattens of international collaboration by analysing publications on COVID-19 published in the first 6 months of the pandemic. The data set comprised articles on COVID-19 indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection...
Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers [0.03%]
快速发表的科学论文质量高吗？基于新冠肺炎高产论文的文献计量分析
Amandeep Khatter,Michael Naughton,Hajira Dambha-Miller et al.
Amandeep Khatter et al.
The impact of COVID-19 has underlined the need for reliable information to guide clinical practice and policy. This urgency has to be balanced against disruption to journal handling capacity and the continued need to ensure scientific rigou...
Niamh O&#x;Connor
Niamh O&#x;Connor
The scholarly publishing industry must be prepared to step back, consider our value, reset our relationships, and be prepared to accept and embrace real change.Three areas of focus during these times should be (1) the importance of communit...