Cross-Theoretical Compliance: An Integrative Compliance Analysis of COVID-19 Mitigation Responses in Israel [0.03%]
理论整合视角下的民众抗疫遵从性研究——基于以色列新冠疫情的实证分析
Anne Leonore de Bruijn,Yuval Feldman,Christopher P Reinders Folmer et al.
Anne Leonore de Bruijn et al.
To understand the question why people obey or break rules, different approaches have focused on different theories and subsets of variables. The present research develops a cross-theoretical approach that integrates these perspectives. We a...
COVID-19 Risk Perception and Support for COVID-19 Mitigation Measures among Local Government Officials in the U.S.: A Test of a Cultural Theory of Risk [0.03%]
美国地方官员认知到的新冠肺炎风险及其支持疫情防控措施的态度：一种风险文化理论的检验
Tamara Dimitrijevska-Markoski,Julius A Nukpezah
Tamara Dimitrijevska-Markoski
This study relies on a cultural theory of risk to examine how cultural biases (hierarchy, individualism, egalitarianism, and fatalism) of local government officials affect their COVID-19 risk perception and support for COVID-19 mitigation m...
The Political Embeddedness of Voluntary Action: The Case of Local Philanthropic COVID-19 Relief Funds [0.03%]
扎根政治的公民行动：以本地新冠疫情慈善救济基金为例
Laurie E Paarlberg,Jin Ai,Megan LePere-Schloop et al.
Laurie E Paarlberg et al.
Scholars and policymakers have long been interested in the complex relationships between political institutions and voluntary collective action. However, the reciprocal nature of their relationships complicates empirical analysis: voluntary...
Can Government Intervention Increase Volunteers and Donations? Analyzing the Influence of VISTA With a Matched Design [0.03%]
政府干预能增加志愿者和捐款吗？用匹配设计分析VISTA的影响
Andrew Messamore,Pamela Paxton,Kristopher Velasco
Andrew Messamore
The United States has long relied on private organizations to provide public services to poor communities. However, while the federal government's support of the civic sector through grants and contracts is well studied, little research inv...
Katherine Farrow,Gilles Grolleau,Naoufel Mzoughi
Katherine Farrow
Behavioral public administration theory suggests that seemingly irrelevant word choice manipulations can influence behavior. We contend that the power of words has frequently been overlooked in the COVID-19 crisis. Given that most decisions...
Trumping the Centers for Disease Control: A Case Comparison of the CDC's Response to COVID-19, H1N1, and Ebola [0.03%]
特朗普与疾病控制中心：CDC对COVID-19、H1N1和埃博拉的反应比较案例研究
Eleanor Schiff,Daniel J Mallinson
Eleanor Schiff
Despite being the richest and most prepared nation in the world, the U.S. responded badly to the COVID-19 crisis. This paper examines the nature of political control and the essence of bureaucratic failure for the Centers for Disease Contro...
Municipal Pathways in Response to COVID-19: A Strategic Management Perspective on Local Public Administration Resilience [0.03%]
应对COVID-19的市政路径：地方公共行政韧性战略管理视角
Jessica Clement,Giovanni Esposito,Nathalie Crutzen
Jessica Clement
This paper aims to understand the different resilience pathways local governments may take during moments of crisis, specifically focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic. Through survey responses from local administrations in Wallonia, Belgium, w...
Double Standards in Frontline Decision Making: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration [0.03%]
前线决策中的双重标准：理论与实证探讨
Nadine Raaphorst,Sandra Groeneveld
Nadine Raaphorst
Drawing on status characteristics and double standards theory, this study explores how social categories may affect the standards tax officials use in evaluating citizen-clients' trustworthiness, leading to differential evaluation. Whereas ...
On the Nature and Strategies of Organized Interests in Health Care Policy Making [0.03%]
有关医疗卫生政策制定中利益集团的性质和策略的研究
Damien Contandriopoulos
Damien Contandriopoulos
Relying on a sweeping review of the literature on interest group influence in health care policy making, we propose a basic definition and a typology of interest groups in provincial health care policy making. Then, using Milbrath's communi...
The unintended consequences of policy changes: the effect of a restrictive abortion policy [0.03%]
政策变化的意外后果——一项限制堕胎政策的影响分析
Jerome S Legge
Jerome S Legge