Most English word forms convey multiple meanings, that is, they are semantically ambiguous. A relatively small proportion of these ambiguous forms are homonyms that convey distinct meanings (e.g., bank may refer to a financial institution or the land bordering a river), while the majority are polysemes that convey interrelated senses (mouth may refer to the mouth of a person or a river). Empirical investigations have demonstrated an advantage for polysemous word forms across various lexical processing tasks, suggesting differences in the way they are organized in semantic memory. However, polysemous forms also tend to be more frequent, comprise fewer phonemes and syllables, and occur in more dense neighborhoods involving more similar sounding words. The nature and extent of these systematic polysemy-form mappings and their influence on processing have yet to be fully investigated. The present study reports an analysis of a corpus of English monomorphemic words (N = 4,466), confirming that phonological features predict a significant proportion of variance (16.8%) in the number of senses conveyed by a word. A series of experiments using relative weight analyses of megastudy data sets of word recognition and production tasks demonstrates that these systematic polysemy-form mappings have a relatively important influence on lexical processing compared to other lexical and semantic variables. These findings suggest that polysemous word forms might be structured systematically to minimize cognitive costs and maintain a compact or kernel lexicon. Implications for current accounts of lexical ambiguity based solely on semantic similarity are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001483 Q22.22024
Revisiting semantic ambiguity in English words: Nonarbitrary polysemy-form mappings influence lexical processing
重新审视英语词汇的语义歧义:非任意的多义词形映射影响词汇加工 翻译改进
作者单位 +展开
作者单位
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001483 PMID: 40193503
摘要 中英对照阅读
Keywords:semantic ambiguity; lexical processing
大多数英文单词形式传达多种含义,即它们在语义上是模棱两可的。这些模棱两可的形式中,相对较小的一部分是同音异义词(例如,“bank”可能指的是金融机构或河边的土地),而大部分则是多义词,它们表达的是相互关联的意义(“mouth”可以指人的嘴或河流的河口)。实证研究已经证明,在各种词汇处理任务中,多义词形式具有优势,这表明它们在语义记忆中的组织方式不同。然而,多义词通常更为频繁,包含更少的音素和音节,并且出现在涉及更多发音相似单词的密集邻域中。这些系统化的多义性-形式映射及其对处理的影响尚未得到充分研究。
本研究报告了一项分析英文单形态词(N = 4,466)语料库的研究,确认了语音特征预测了一个单词所传达意义数量的重要比例(16.8%)。一系列使用大规模数据集进行相对权重分析的词汇识别和生成任务实验表明,这些系统化的多义性-形式映射对词汇处理的影响相较于其他词汇和语义变量更为重要。这些发现表明,多义词可能被系统化地组织以最小化认知成本,并维持一个精简或核心的词汇库。讨论了基于单纯语义相似性的当前词汇模棱两可解释方法的含义。(PsycInfo数据库记录 © 2025 APA,版权所有)
相关内容
-
Addressing semantic ambiguity in biotechnology: proposals from the European research infrastructure IBISBA
解决生物技术中的语义歧义:来自欧洲研究基础设施IBISBA的建议
New biotechnology. 2025 Apr 23:S1871-6784(25)00047-0.
-
The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity
语法和语义歧义视角下的额叶-颞叶语言系统的功能分区
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1324-35.
-
Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence
预测和上下文环境支持对词汇加工的影响:预测优先作用
Cognition. 2015 Mar:136:135-49.
-
Thalamic deep brain stimulation decelerates automatic lexical activation
丘脑深部电刺激降低词汇激活反应速度
Brain and cognition. 2017 Feb:111:34-43.
-
Lexical processing and organization in bilingual first language acquisition: Guiding future research
双语第一语言习得中的词汇加工与组织:指引未来研究方向
Psychological bulletin. 2016 Jun;142(6):655-67.
-
Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition
第二语言词汇识别中的语义歧义效应
Journal of psycholinguistic research. 2018 Jun;47(3):523-536.
-
Semantic ambiguity and syntactic bootstrapping: The case of conjoined-subject intransitive sentences
语义歧义和句法引导:联合主语不及格句的例子
Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development. 2016 Jan 1;12(1):14-41.
-
The neural underpinnings of semantic ambiguity and anaphora
语义模糊性与代词指称的神经机制研究
Brain research. 2010 Jan 22:1311:93-109.