首页 正文

Journal of patient-reported outcomes. 2023 Dec 12;7(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00666-9 N/A2.42024

Let's talk about it: an exploration of the comparative use of three different digital platforms to gather patient-reported outcome measures

关于采集患者报告结局的三种数字平台的比较研究 翻译改进

Anna Hundt Golden  1, Meghan Hufstader Gabriel  1, Jon Russo  1, Mark Price  1, Stephen Ruhmel  2, Ami Nilsson  3, Patricia Shepherd Delong  3, Jennifer Jelsma  4  5, Michelle Carty  6

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • 2 Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 920 Route 202, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA. sruhmel@its.jnj.com.
  • 3 Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 920 Route 202, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA.
  • 4 EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • 5 Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • 6 QualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.
  • DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00666-9 PMID: 38085402

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures provide valuable evidence in clinical trials; however, poor compliance with PRO measures is a notable and long-standing problem, resulting in missing data that potentially impact the interpretation of trial results. Interactive, patient-centric platforms may increase participants' motivation to complete PRO measures over the course of a clinical trial. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and optimize the usability of 3 popular consumer technologies-a traditional app-based interface, a chatbot interface, and a speech-operated interface-that may be used to improve user engagement and compliance with PRO measures.

    Methods: Participants aged 18-75 years from the general United States population tested the usability of 3 ePRO platforms: a traditional app-based interface using Datacubed Health Platform (Datacubed), a web-based chatbot interface using the Orbita platform, and a speech-operated Alexa interface using an Alexa Skill called "My Daily Wellness." The usability of these platforms was tested with 2 PRO measures: the EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12v2 Health Survey (SF-12v2), Daily recall. Using a crossover design, 3 cohorts of participants tested each ePRO platform daily for 1 week. After testing, interviews were conducted regarding the participants' experience with each platform.

    Results: A total of 24 adults participated in the study. The mean age of participants was 45 years (range, 21-71 years), and half were female (n = 12; 50%). Overall, participants prioritized speed, ease of use, and device portability in selecting their preferred platform. The Datacubed app met these criteria and was the preferred platform among most participants (n = 20; 83%). Participants also suggested various modifications to the platforms, such as programmable notifications, adjustable speed, and additional daily reminders.

    Conclusions: These data demonstrate the importance of speed, ease of use, and device portability, features that are currently incorporated in the Datacubed app, in ePRO platforms used in future clinical trials. Additionally, the usability of ePRO platforms may be optimized by adding programmable notifications, adjustable speed, and increased daily reminders. The results of this study may be used to enhance the usability and patient centricity of these platforms to improve user compliance and engagement during clinical trials.

    Keywords: Apps; Chatbots; Comparative usability; Electronic patient-reported outcomes platforms; Voice assistants.

    Keywords:digital platforms

    Copyright © Journal of patient-reported outcomes. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Journal of patient-reported outcomes

    缩写:

    ISSN:2509-8020

    e-ISSN:

    IF/分区:2.4/N/A

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Let's talk about it: an exploration of the comparative use of three different digital platforms to gather patient-reported outcome measures