首页 正文

Meta-Analysis Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2023 Dec;53(12):2447-2461. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01902-4 Q19.42025

Performance Implications of Force-Vector-Specific Resistance and Plyometric Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

力矢量特定阻力与 plyometric 训练对运动表现影响的系统综述和荟萃分析 翻译改进

Nicklas Junge  1, Tobias B Jørgensen  2, Lars Nybo  2

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Integrative Physiology, Institute for Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. nicklas.junge@nexs.ku.dk.
  • 2 Department of Integrative Physiology, Institute for Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01902-4 PMID: 37594654

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Background: According to the principle of specific adaptations to imposed demands, training induces specific adaptations that predominantly transfer towards performance tasks of similar physiological and/or biomechanical characteristics. Functional performance improvements secondary to resistance and plyometric training have been hypothesized to be force-vector specific; however, the literature pertaining to this matter appears somewhat equivocal.

    Objective: The objective of the present systematic review with meta-analysis was to synthesize the available body of literature regarding the performance implications of vertically and horizontally oriented resistance- and plyometric training.

    Data sources: The review drew from the following sources: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar.

    Study eligibility criteria: To qualify for inclusion, studies had to compare the efficacy of vertically and horizontally oriented resistance and/or plyometric training, with one or multiple outcome measures related to vertical/horizontal jumping, sprinting and/or change of direction speed (CODS).

    Study appraisal and synthesis: For each outcome measure, an inverse-variance random effects model was applied, with between-treatment effects quantified by the standardized mean difference (SMD) and associated 95% confidence- and prediction intervals.

    Results: Between-treatment effects were of trivial magnitude for vertical jumping (SMD = - 0.04, P = 0.69) and long-distance (≥ 20 m) sprinting (0.03, P = 0.83), whereas small to moderate effects in favor of horizontal training were observed for horizontal jumping (0.25, P = 0.07), short-distance (≤ 10 m) sprinting (0.72, P = 0.01) and CODS (0.31, P = 0.06), although only the short-distance sprint outcome reached statistical significance.

    Conclusions: In conclusion, our meta-analysis reveals a potential superiority of horizontally oriented training for horizontal jumping, short-distance sprinting and CODS, whereas vertically oriented training is equally efficacious for vertical jumping and long-distance sprinting. From an applied perspective, the present analysis provides an advanced basis for weighting of vertical and horizontal force-vector exercises as an integrated component for optimizing sport-specific performances. The present systematic review with meta-analysis was not a priori registered.

    Keywords:plyometric training; meta-analysis

    Copyright © Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Sports medicine

    缩写:SPORTS MED

    ISSN:0112-1642

    e-ISSN:1179-2035

    IF/分区:9.4/Q1

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Performance Implications of Force-Vector-Specific Resistance and Plyometric Training: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis