首页 正文

Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2023 Feb;44(2):230-233. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.72 Q22.92025

A mixed-methods evaluation on the efficacy and perceptions of needleless connector disinfectants

无针连接器消毒剂的有效性和感知的混合方法评价 翻译改进

Scott C Roberts  1  2, Curtis A Hendrix 2nd  1, Lauren M Edwards  3, Richard S Feinn  4, Richard A Martinello  1  2  5, Thomas S Murray  2  5

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • 2 Department of Infection Prevention, Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • 3 Quality & Safety, Yale New Haven Children's Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • 4 Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University North Haven, North Haven, Connecticut.
  • 5 Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.72 PMID: 35387702

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Objective: Optimizing needleless connector hub disinfection practice is a key strategy in central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention. In this mixed-methods evaluation, 3 products with varying scrub times were tested for experimental disinfection followed by a qualitative nursing assessment of each.

    Methods: Needleless connectors were inoculated with varying concentrations of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus followed by disinfection with a 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) wipe (a 15-second scrub time and a 15-second dry time), a 70% IPA cap (a 10-second scrub time and a 5-second dry time), or a 3.15% chlorhexidine gluconate with 70% IPA (CHG/IPA) wipe (a 5-second scrub time and a 5-second dry time). Cultures of needleless connectors were obtained after disinfection to quantify bacterial reduction. This was followed by surveying a convenience sample of nursing staff with intensive care unit assignments at an academic tertiary hospital on use of each product.

    Results: All products reduced overall bacterial burden when compared to sterile water controls, however the IPA and CHG/IPA wipes were superior to the IPA caps when product efficacy was compared. Nursing staff noted improved compliance with CHG/IPA wipes compared with the IPA wipes and the IPA caps, with many preferring the lesser scrub and dry times required for disinfection.

    Conclusion: Achieving adequate bacterial disinfection of needleless connectors while maximizing healthcare staff compliance with scrub and dry times may be best achieved with a combination CHG/IPA wipe.

    Keywords:mixed methods evaluation

    Copyright © Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Infection control and hospital epidemiology

    缩写:INFECT CONT HOSP EP

    ISSN:0899-823X

    e-ISSN:1559-6834

    IF/分区:2.9/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    A mixed-methods evaluation on the efficacy and perceptions of needleless connector disinfectants