The species composition of culturable bacteria in Scottish grassland soils was investigated using a combination of Biolog and 16S rDNA analysis for characterisation of isolates. The inclusion of a molecular approach allowed direct comparison of sequences from culturable bacteria with sequences obtained during analysis of DNA extracted directly from the same soil samples. Bacterial strains were isolated on Pseudomonas isolation agar (PIA), a selective medium, and on tryptone soya agar (TSA), a general laboratory medium. In total, 12 and 21 morphologically different bacterial cultures were isolated on PIA and TSA, respectively. Biolog and sequencing placed PIA isolates in the same taxonomic groups, the majority of cultures belonging to the Pseudomonas (sensu stricto) group. However, analysis of 16S rDNA sequences proved more efficient than Biolog for characterising TSA isolates due to limitations of the Microlog database for identifying environmental bacteria. In general, 16S rDNA sequences from TSA isolates showed high similarities to cultured species represented in sequence databases, although TSA-8 showed only 92.5% similarity to the nearest relative, Bacillus insolitus. In general, there was very little overlap between the culturable and uncultured bacterial communities, although two sequences, PIA-2 and TSA-13, showed >99% similarity to soil clones. A cloning step was included prior to sequence analysis of two isolates, TSA-5 and TSA-14, and analysis of several clones confirmed that these cultures comprised at least four and three sequence types, respectively. All isolate clones were most closely related to uncultured bacteria, with clone TSA-5.1 showing 99.8% similarity to a sequence amplified directly from the same soil sample. Interestingly, one clone, TSA-5.4, clustered within a novel group comprising only uncultured sequences. This group, which is associated with the novel, deep-branching Acidobacterium capsulatum lineage, also included clones isolated during direct analysis of the same soil and from a wide range of other sample types studied elsewhere. The study demonstrates the value of fine-scale molecular analysis for identification of laboratory isolates and indicates the culturability of approximately 1% of the total population but under a restricted range of media and cultivation conditions.
FEMS microbiology ecology. 2001 Mar;35(1):37-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00786.x Q23.22025
Impact of cultivation on characterisation of species composition of soil bacterial communities
耕作对土壤细菌群落物种组成特征的影响 翻译改进
作者单位 +展开
作者单位
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00786.x PMID: 11248388
摘要 Ai翻译
Keywords:soil bacterial communities
相关内容
-
Biogeographic survey of soil bacterial communities across Antarctica
南极土壤细菌群落的生物地理调查
Microbiome. 2024 Jan 12;12(1):9.
-
Response of soil bacterial communities to sulfadiazine present in manure: Protection and adaptation mechanisms of extracellular polymeric substances
抗生素磺胺二唑污染土壤中细菌的响应及其胞外聚合物的保护和适应机制
Journal of hazardous materials. 2021 Apr 15:408:124887.
-
Phylogenetic structure of soil bacterial communities predicts ecosystem functioning
土壤细菌群落的系统发育结构可预测生态系统功能
FEMS microbiology ecology. 2015 May;91(5):fiv031.
-
Streptomyces strains modulate dynamics of soil bacterial communities and their efficacy in disease suppression caused by Phytophthora capsici
链霉菌菌株调节土壤细菌群落动态及其对由辣椒疫病菌引起的土传病害的抑制效力
Scientific reports. 2021 Apr 29;11(1):9317.
-
The ecology of heterogeneity: soil bacterial communities and C dynamics
异质性下的生态学:土壤细菌群落与碳动态关系研究
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 2020 May 11;375(1798):20190249.
-
The under-recognized dominance of Verrucomicrobia in soil bacterial communities
被忽视的地衣芽孢杆菌在土壤细菌群落中的主导地位
Soil biology & biochemistry. 2011 Jul;43(7):1450-1455.
-
Soil bacterial communities of a calcium-supplemented and a reference watershed at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF), New Hampshire, USA
美国新罕布什尔州胡巴德布鲁克试验森林(HBEF)钙施加流域和对照流域土壤细菌群落结构比较研究
FEMS microbiology ecology. 2012 Mar;79(3):728-40.
-
Ecological relevance of flagellar motility in soil bacterial communities
土壤细菌菌群中鞭毛运动的生态意义
The ISME journal. 2024 Jan 8;18(1):wrae067.