From understanding to justifying: Computational reliabilism for AI-based forensic evidence evaluation [0.03%]
从理解到辩护：基于人工智能的证据评估的计算可靠主义
Juan M Durán,David van der Vloed,Arnout Ruifrok et al.
Juan M Durán et al.
Techniques from artificial intelligence (AI) can be used in forensic evidence evaluation and are currently applied in biometric fields. However, it is generally not possible to fully understand how and why these algorithms reach their concl...
Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making [0.03%]
贝叶斯决策理论在法医鉴定中的微妙之处：关于合理决策中验证研究数据作用的最近讨论的注释
Alex Biedermann
Alex Biedermann
This technical note extends a recent discussion in this journal of the role of validation study data in rational decision making. One argument that has been made in this context, using elements of Bayesian decision theory, is that further a...
Loene M Howes,Roberta Julian,Renee Wilson et al.
Loene M Howes et al.
Forensic science is socially constructed within particular contexts, with notable challenges for countries of the Global South. This study explored forensic capacity development taking place under a bilateral agreement between the governmen...
Jason M Chin,Anna-Maria Arabia,Merryn McKinnon et al.
Jason M Chin et al.
Forensic scientific practitioners and researchers must navigate a rapidly growing body of research. This makes it increasingly challenging to inform courts, lawyers, and other decision makers about the state of the field, thus heightening t...
Impact of swabbing solutions on the recovery of biological material from non-porous surfaces [0.03%]
擦拭溶液对非多孔表面生物材料采集的影响研究
Agnieszka Kuffel,Niamh Nic Daeid,Alexander Gray
Agnieszka Kuffel
Cotton swabs are one of the most effective methods of retrieving biological evidence. The efficiency of swab-based DNA recovery is impacted by many factors, such as the swabbing technique, source of DNA and volume and type of wetting soluti...
UK parliamentary inquiry reports in forensic science - Plus ça change? [0.03%]
英国议会关于法医科学的调查报告——毫无新意？
Shrey Jhalani,Ruth M Morgan,Amelia Shooter et al.
Shrey Jhalani et al.
Forensic Science provision in England and Wales underpins scientific evidence in many criminal cases. The quality of scientific investigation by scientists and the presentation of science insights has been under scrutiny and it is increasin...
Training on dirty labels: Rejoinder to Kotsoglou and Biedermann [0.03%]
针对Kotsoglou和Biedermann的评论的回应：在“脏标签”上的训练
Dmitri Asonov,Maksim Krylov,Anastasiya Ryabikina et al.
Dmitri Asonov et al.
A template Bayesian network for combining forensic evidence on an item with an uncertain relation to the disputed activities [0.03%]
一个模板型贝叶斯网络在具有不确定关系的物品上组合法医证据以解决争议事件的问题中的应用
M Vink,J A de Koeijer,M J Sjerps
M Vink
Most of the forensic evidence evaluations given activity level propositions are centered around an item which is assumed to be linked to an alleged activity. However, the relation between an item of interest and an activity may be contested...
Exploring the quantity and type of evidence collected during criminal investigations in South Korea [0.03%]
韩国刑事调查中收集的证据的数量和类型探究
Minhwan Jang
Minhwan Jang
This article explores the patterns of 11 types of criminal evidence collected by a detective team in real-life 172 volume crime cases that occurred in South Korea. Electronic and paper case files were analyzed to examine the patterns of how...
Maria Cuellar,Sheng Gao,Heike Hofmann
Maria Cuellar
Forensic toolmark analysis traditionally relies on subjective human judgment, leading to inconsistencies and lack of transparency. The multitude of variables, including angles and directions of mark generation, further complicates compariso...