首页 文献索引 SCI期刊 AI助手
期刊目录筛选

期刊名:Research synthesis methods

缩写:RES SYNTH METHODS

ISSN:1759-2879

e-ISSN:1759-2887

IF/分区:6.1/Q1

文章目录 更多期刊信息

共收录本刊相关文章索引615
Clinical Trial Case Reports Meta-Analysis RCT Review Systematic Review
Classical Article Case Reports Clinical Study Clinical Trial Clinical Trial Protocol Comment Comparative Study Editorial Guideline Letter Meta-Analysis Multicenter Study Observational Study Randomized Controlled Trial Review Systematic Review
Paschalis Karakasis,Konstantinos I Bougioukas,Konstantinos Pamporis et al. Paschalis Karakasis et al.
This study aimed to assess the methods and outcomes of The Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 appraisals in overviews of reviews (overviews) of interventions in the cardiovascular field and identify factors that are as...
Brinley N Zabriskie,Nolan Cole,Jacob Baldauf et al. Brinley N Zabriskie et al.
Meta-analyses have become the gold standard for synthesizing evidence from multiple clinical trials, and they are especially useful when outcomes are rare or adverse since individual trials often lack sufficient power to detect a treatment ...
Michael Borenstein Michael Borenstein
In any meta-analysis, it is critically important to report the dispersion in effects as well as the mean effect. If an intervention has a moderate clinical impact on average we also need to know if the impact is moderate for all relevant po...
Céline Chapelle,Gwénaël Le Teuff,Paul Jacques Zufferey et al. Céline Chapelle et al.
The number of meta-analyses of aggregate data has dramatically increased due to the facility of obtaining data from publications and the development of free, easy-to-use, and specialised statistical software. Even when meta-analyses include...
Andreas Halman,Alicia Oshlack Andreas Halman
A systematic review is a type of literature review that aims to collect and analyse all available evidence from the literature on a particular topic. The process of screening and identifying eligible articles from the vast amounts of litera...
Peter J Godolphin,Nadine Marlin,Chantelle Cornett et al. Peter J Godolphin et al.
Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of randomised trials are considered a reliable way to assess participant-level treatment effect modifiers but may not make the best use of the available data. Traditionally, effect modifiers a...
Timo Gnambs,Ulrich Schroeders Timo Gnambs
Meta-analyses of treatment effects in randomized control trials are often faced with the problem of missing information required to calculate effect sizes and their sampling variances. Particularly, correlations between pre- and posttest sc...
Shifeng Liu,Florence T Bourgeois,Claire Narang et al. Shifeng Liu et al.
Searching for trials is a key task in systematic reviews and a focus of automation. Previous approaches required knowing examples of relevant trials in advance, and most methods are focused on published trial articles. To complement existin...
Maya B Mathur Maya B Mathur
Meta-analyses can be compromised by studies' internal biases (e.g., confounding in nonrandomized studies) as well as publication bias. These biases often operate nonadditively: publication bias that favors significant, positive results sele...
Elizabeth Korevaar,Simon L Turner,Andrew B Forbes et al. Elizabeth Korevaar et al.
Interrupted time series (ITS) are often meta-analysed to inform public health and policy decisions but examination of the statistical methods for ITS analysis and meta-analysis in this context is limited. We simulated meta-analyses of ITS s...