首页 文献索引 SCI期刊 AI助手
期刊目录筛选

期刊名:Research synthesis methods

缩写:RES SYNTH METHODS

ISSN:1759-2879

e-ISSN:1759-2887

IF/分区:6.1/Q1

文章目录 更多期刊信息

共收录本刊相关文章索引615
Clinical Trial Case Reports Meta-Analysis RCT Review Systematic Review
Classical Article Case Reports Clinical Study Clinical Trial Clinical Trial Protocol Comment Comparative Study Editorial Guideline Letter Meta-Analysis Multicenter Study Observational Study Randomized Controlled Trial Review Systematic Review
Adam R Hafdahl Adam R Hafdahl
This sixth 'Article Alerts' installment's print component includes 100 methodological articles about research synthesis published in 2011. Since the preceding installment, more than 2100 items have been added to the archive component, mostl...
William R Shadish William R Shadish
This issue of Research Synthesis Methods is devoted to discussion of the origins of modern meta-analysis. Three articles by pioneers in development meta-analysis are by Gene Glass, Frank Schmidt, and Robert Rosenthal, respectively. They ref...
Gerta Rücker,Guido Schwarzer Gerta Rücker
In systematic reviews based on network meta-analysis, the network structure should be visualized. Network plots often have been drawn by hand using generic graphical software. A typical way of drawing networks, also implemented in statistic...
Mark S Corbett,Julian P T Higgins,Nerys F Woolacott Mark S Corbett
A key component of the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool for critically evaluating randomised trials is the consideration of whether baseline characteristics of the treatment groups being compared are systematically different. Cons...
T D Stanley,Hristos Doucouliagos T D Stanley
Publication selection bias is a serious challenge to the integrity of all empirical sciences. We derive meta-regression approximations to reduce this bias. Our approach employs Taylor polynomial approximations to the conditional mean of a t...
Alison O&#x;Mara-Eves,Ginny Brunton,David McDaid et al. Alison O&#x;Mara-Eves et al.
Driven by necessity in our own complex review, we developed alternative systematic ways of identifying relevant evidence where the key concepts are generally not focal to the primary studies' aims and are found across multiple disciplines-t...
Ian Shemilt,Antonia Simon,Gareth J Hollands et al. Ian Shemilt et al.
In scoping reviews, boundaries of relevant evidence may be initially fuzzy, with refined conceptual understanding of interventions and their proposed mechanisms of action an intended output of the scoping process rather than its starting po...