Subsequent full publication of qualitative studies presented at United Kingdom Royal College of Nursing Research Conference 2015 and 2016: A follow-up study [0.03%]
在2015和2016年英国皇家护理学院研究会议中提出的定性研究的后续全文发表：一项跟进研究
Ingrid Toews,John L Z Nyirenda,Julia Stadelmaier et al.
Ingrid Toews et al.
A considerable proportion of quantitative research remains unpublished once completed. Little research has documented non-dissemination and dissemination bias in qualitative research. This study aimed to generate evidence on the extent of n...
Applying machine classifiers to update searches: Analysis from two case studies [0.03%]
机器分类器在更新搜索中的应用：两个案例研究的分析
Claire Stansfield,Gillian Stokes,James Thomas
Claire Stansfield
Manual screening of citation records could be reduced by using machine classifiers to remove records of very low relevance. This seems particularly feasible for update searches, where a machine classifier can be trained from past screening ...
PsychOpen CAMA: Publication of community-augmented meta-analyses in psychology [0.03%]
PsychOpen CAMA：心理学领域社区增强元分析的出版
Tanja Burgard,Michael Bosnjak,Robert Studtrucker
Tanja Burgard
To enable optimal decision-making based on the best evidence available, open syntheses are called for. To make data accessible and comprehensible even for decision-makers without proficient knowledge in meta-analysis, a graphical user inter...
Meta-Analysis
Research synthesis methods. 2022 Jan;13(1):134-143. DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1536 2022
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing [0.03%]
利用自然语言处理对临床前文献的偏差风险进行评估
Qianying Wang,Jing Liao,Mirella Lapata et al.
Qianying Wang et al.
We sought to apply natural language processing to the task of automatic risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature, which could speed the process of systematic review, provide information to guide research improvement activity, and s...
Introduction to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists [0.03%]
系统评价和荟萃分析优选报告项目2020介绍及对研究综述方法学家的意义
Matthew J Page,David Moher,Joanne E McKenzie
Matthew J Page
Systematic reviews should be reported completely and accurately so that users can interpret and appraise the review findings appropriately. In this commentary, we describe key features of a major update of the Preferred Reporting Items for ...
The application of AMSTAR2 in 32 overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross-sectional study [0.03%]
AMSTAR2在32项精神和行为障碍干预系统评价综述中的应用：一项横断面研究
Karina Karolina De Santis,Robert C Lorenz,Meret Lakeberg et al.
Karina Karolina De Santis et al.
'A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews, version 2' (AMSTAR2) is a 16-item tool to critically appraise systematic reviews (SRs) of healthcare interventions. This study aimed to assess the methods and outcomes of AMSTAR2 appraisals ...
Reporting of Cochrane systematic review protocols with network meta-analyses-A scoping review [0.03%]
含有网络荟萃分析的Cochrane系统评价方案报告——一项范围综述
Rui Wang,Kerry Dwan,Marian G Showell et al.
Rui Wang et al.
Publishing systematic review protocols is a fundamental part of systematic reviews to ensure transparency and reproducibility. In this scoping review, we aimed to evaluate reporting of Cochrane systematic review protocols with network meta-...
Bibliometric study of 'overviews of systematic reviews' of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor [0.03%]
健康干预措施的“系统评价综述”的引文和期刊影响因子的计量研究分析
Carole Lunny,Trish Neelakant,Alyssa Chen et al.
Carole Lunny et al.
Overviews synthesising the results of multiple systematic reviews help inform evidence-based clinical practice. In this first of two companion papers, we evaluate the bibliometrics of overviews, including their prevalence and factors affect...
Retrospective median power, false positive meta-analysis and large-scale replication [0.03%]
回顾中位数检验力、虚假阳性meta分析及大规模重复实验
T D Stanley,Hristos Doucouliagos,John P A Ioannidis
T D Stanley
Recent, high-profile, large-scale, preregistered failures to replicate uncover that many highly-regarded experiments are "false positives"; that is, statistically significant results of underlying null effects. Large surveys of research rev...
Meta-Analysis
Research synthesis methods. 2022 Jan;13(1):88-108. DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1529 2022
Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals [0.03%]
倡导图书馆员的专业技能以支持可持续发展目标的证据合成工作
Kate Ghezzi-Kopel,Jessica Ault,Gracian Chimwaza et al.
Kate Ghezzi-Kopel et al.
Evidence syntheses that engage librarians as co-authors produce higher-quality results than those that do not. Trained as teachers, researchers, and information managers, librarians possess expert knowledge on research methodologies and inf...