Meta-analysis of prevalence: I2 statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity [0.03%]
META分析之加权：I2统计量及异质性处理方法
Celina Borges Migliavaca,Cinara Stein,Verônica Colpani et al.
Celina Borges Migliavaca et al.
Over the last decade, there has been a 10-fold increase in the number of published systematic reviews of prevalence. In meta-analyses of prevalence, the summary estimate represents an average prevalence from included studies. This estimate ...
Meta-Analysis
Research synthesis methods. 2022 May;13(3):363-367. DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1547 2022
Predicting personalised absolute treatment effects in individual participant data meta-analysis: An introduction to splines [0.03%]
基于个体患者数据的meta分析中预测个性化治疗效应：介绍样条函数的方法
Michail Belias,Maroeska M Rovers,Jeroen Hoogland et al.
Michail Belias et al.
Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results [0.03%]
识别ClinicalTrials.gov试验注册与其已发表结果之间未报告的联系
Shifeng Liu,Florence T Bourgeois,Adam G Dunn
Shifeng Liu
A substantial proportion of trial registrations are not linked to corresponding published articles, limiting analyses and new tools. Our aim was to develop a method for finding articles reporting the results of trials that are registered on...
The confounder matrix: A tool to assess confounding bias in systematic reviews of observational studies of etiology [0.03%]
混淆矩阵：评估病因学观察性研究系统评价中混杂偏倚的工具
Julie M Petersen,Malcolm Barrett,Katherine A Ahrens et al.
Julie M Petersen et al.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential for drawing conclusions regarding etiologic associations between exposures or interventions and health outcomes. Observational studies comprise a substantive source of the evidence base. On...
Reevaluation of statistically significant meta-analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung-Knapp method and prediction intervals-A methodological study [0.03%]
采用Hartung-Knapp法和预测区间重新评价晚期癌症患者中统计学显著的荟萃分析-一种方法学研究
Waldemar Siemens,Joerg J Meerpohl,Miriam S Rohe et al.
Waldemar Siemens et al.
Using the Hartung-Knapp method and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) in random-effects meta-analyses is recommended by experts but rarely applied. Therefore, we aimed to reevaluate statistically significant meta-analyses using the Hartung-Knap...
Meta-Analysis
Research synthesis methods. 2022 May;13(3):330-341. DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1543 2022
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta-research study of research waste [0.03%]
一项新的分类法开发用于系统评价 overview 之间的重叠：关于研究浪费的元科研研究
Carole Lunny,Emma K Reid,Trish Neelakant et al.
Carole Lunny et al.
Multiple 'overviews of reviews' conducted on the same topic ("overlapping overviews") represent a waste of research resources and can confuse clinicians making decisions amongst competing treatments. We aimed to assess the frequency and cha...
Facilitating open science practices for research syntheses: PreregRS guides preregistration [0.03%]
促进研究综述的开放科学实践：PreregRS引导预注册指南
Jürgen Schneider,Iris Backfisch,Andreas Lachner
Jürgen Schneider
Researchers increasingly engage in adopting open science practices in the field of research syntheses, such as preregistration. Preregistration is a central open science practice in empirical research to enhance transparency in the research...
Machine learning in systematic reviews: Comparing automated text clustering with Lingo3G and human researcher categorization in a rapid review [0.03%]
机器学习在系统评价中的应用：通过快速综述比较自动化文本聚类与Lingo3G和人工分类的效果
Ashley Elizabeth Muller,Heather Melanie R Ames,Patricia Sofia Jacobsen Jardim et al.
Ashley Elizabeth Muller et al.
Systematic reviews are resource-intensive. The machine learning tools being developed mostly focus on the study identification process, but tools to assist in analysis and categorization are also needed. One possibility is to use unsupervis...
A non-parametric approach for jointly combining evidence on progression free and overall survival time in network meta-analysis [0.03%]
一种非参数方法联合结合无进展生存期和总生存期在网状meta分析中的证据
Caitlin H Daly,Ross Maconachie,A E Ades et al.
Caitlin H Daly et al.
Randomised controlled trials of cancer treatments typically report progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Existing methods to synthesise evidence on PFS and OS either rely on the proportional hazards assumption ...
Meta-Analysis
Research synthesis methods. 2022 Sep;13(5):573-584. DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1539 2022
Leonhard Held,Robert Matthews,Manuela Ott et al.
Leonhard Held et al.
It is now widely accepted that the standard inferential toolkit used by the scientific research community-null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST)-is not fit for purpose. Yet despite the threat posed to the scientific enterprise, there i...