The Application of Australian Rights Protections to the Use of Hepatitis C Notification Data to Engage People 'Lost to Follow Up' [0.03%]
澳大利亚权利保护在乙型肝炎通知数据中的应用以吸引那些被跟踪的人
Freya Saich,Shelley Walker,Margaret Hellard et al.
Freya Saich et al.
Hepatitis C is a global public health threat, affecting 56 million people worldwide. The World Health Organization has committed to eliminating hepatitis C by 2030. Although new treatments have revolutionised the treatment and care of peopl...
Antimicrobial Resistance, One Health Interventions and the Least Restrictive Alternative Principle [0.03%]
抗菌素耐药性、同一健康干预措施和最少限制原则
Davide Fumagalli
Davide Fumagalli
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasingly recognised as a threat to human, animal and environmental health. In an effort to counter this threat, several intervention plans have been proposed and implemented by states and organisations ...
Developing an Ethical Evaluation Framework for Coercive Antimicrobial Stewardship Policies [0.03%]
强制性抗菌药物管理政策的伦理评价框架的构建
Tess Johnson
Tess Johnson
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been declared one of the top ten global public health threats facing humanity. To address AMR, coercive antimicrobial stewardship policies are being enacted in some settings. These policies, like all in pu...
Reciprocity, Fairness and the Financial Burden of Undertaking COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine in Australia [0.03%]
关于在澳大利亚进行COVID酒店隔离的 reciprocity、fairness和financial负担
Kari Pahlman,Jane Williams,Diego S Silva et al.
Kari Pahlman et al.
In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories intro...
Understanding Pandemic Solidarity: Mutual Support During the First COVID-19 Lockdown in the United Kingdom [0.03%]
理解大流行病团结：英国第一次新冠封锁期间的相互支持
Stephanie Johnson,Stephen Roberts,Sarah Hayes et al.
Stephanie Johnson et al.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the concept of solidarity has been invoked frequently. Much interest has centred around how citizens and communities support one another during times of uncertainty. Yet, empirical research which accounts a...
How to Design Consent for Health Data Research? An Analysis of Arguments of Solidarity [0.03%]
如何设计健康数据研究的同意书？团结论点的分析
Svenja Wiertz
Svenja Wiertz
The article discusses the impact different concepts of solidarity can have on debates on models of consent for non-interventional research. It introduces three concepts of solidarity that have been referenced in bioethical debates: a purely...
Thomas Schramme
Thomas Schramme
The paper defends the World Health Organisation (WHO) definition of health against widespread criticism. The common objections are due to a possible misinterpretation of the word complete in the descriptor of health as 'complete physical, m...
Healthiness as a Virtue: The Healthism of mHealth and the Challenges to Public Health [0.03%]
健康作为一种美德：“ Healthism”的移动健康及对公共健康的挑战
Michał Wieczorek,Leon Walter Sebastian Rossmaier
Michał Wieczorek
Mobile health (mHealth) technologies for self-monitoring health-relevant parameters such as heart frequency, sleeping patterns or exercise regimes aim at fostering healthy behavior change and increasing the individual users to promote and m...
Can Geographically Targeted Vaccinations Be Ethically Justified? The Case of Norway During the COVID-19 Pandemic [0.03%]
针对地理区域进行疫苗接种能否从伦理上得到辩护？挪威新冠疫情期间的案例分析
Håkon Amdam,Ole Frithjof Norheim,Carl Tollef Solberg et al.
Håkon Amdam et al.
This article discusses the fairness of geographically targeted vaccinations (GTVs). During the initial period of local and global vaccine scarcity, health authorities had to enact priority-setting strategies for mass vaccination campaigns a...
Correction: Inequalities in the Challenges Affecting Children and their Families during COVID-19 with School Closures and Reopenings: A Qualitative Study [0.03%]
关于新冠疫情中学校关闭和重新开放期间影响儿童及其家庭的挑战中的不平等性的更正：质性研究
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac030.]. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
Published Erratum
Public health ethics. 2023 Apr 28;16(2):202. DOI:10.1093/phe/phad010 2023