Marcel Verweij,Roland Pierik
Marcel Verweij
In this article we respond to critical comments from colleagues on Inducing Immunity? Justifying Immunization Policies in Times of Vaccine Hesitancy (MITpress, 2024). We explain why we have chosen to focus on John Stuart Mill's harm princip...
Précis of Inducing Immunity? Justifying Immunization Policies in Times of Vaccine Hesitancy 1 [0.03%]
疫苗犹豫时代的免疫政策诱导与辩护研究概要
Roland Pierik,Marcel Verweij
Roland Pierik
Lucie White
Lucie White
There are two main ways in which a mandatory vaccination policy is often defended-by accusing vaccine refusers of 'free riding', or by appealing to the 'harm principle'. In their recent book, Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij take the latter...
Steven R Kraaijeveld
Steven R Kraaijeveld
In their recent book, Inducing Immunity (2024), Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij develop an account of collective immunization according to which liberal-democratic governments are sometimes justified in restricting people's freedom to refu...
Justin Bernstein
Justin Bernstein
In this commentary, I will contend that one of Pierik and Verweij's central arguments for vaccine mandates faces significant obstacles because of their attempt to apply Mill's harm principle. More specifically, they argue that vaccine refus...
M van den Hoven
M van den Hoven
We know that vaccine hesitancy is closely related to distrust in health organisations, pharmaceutical industry or governments (Vuolanto et al. 2024). At the end of the book, I am left with the question what is necessary to bridge the gap of...
Best Interest, Basic Interest, and Parental Autonomy in Child Vaccination Choices. On Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij's Inducing Immunity? [0.03%]
儿童疫苗接种选择中的最大利益、基本利益与父母自主——罗兰·皮耶里克和马塞尔·弗雷韦尔著《诱导免疫？》书评
Alberto Giubilini
Alberto Giubilini
Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij, in their excellent book Inducing Immunity?, draw a distinction between 'best interest' and 'basic interest' and use such distinction as a criterion for legitimate state interference with parental choices, i...
Planning For Unmet Social Needs In Pandemics: Teachers' Experiences Of Unacknowledged Care Work [0.03%]
大流行期间满足社会需求的规划：被忽视的关怀工作带来的教师经历
Jane Williams,Claire Hooker,Gwendolyn L Gilbert et al.
Jane Williams et al.
This paper examines the experiences of teachers in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic from a care ethics perspective. While pandemic preparedness plans prioritised continuity of services and infection control, they failed to anticipate ...
Ethical Challenges Encountered by Humanitarian Aid Workers in Temporary Displacement Camps in the Context of Covid-19 [0.03%]
新冠疫情下人道主义救援人员在临时难民营遇到的伦理挑战
Robyn Mellett,Matthew Hunt
Robyn Mellett
Humanitarian aid workers face several ethical challenges. They work in resource-limited settings, navigate power imbalances and face obstacles responding to populations affected by crisis. The Covid-19 pandemic added additional layers of ch...
Correction to: Zoonoethics and Inclusive One Health Governance for H5N1 Panzootic: From Animal Culling to Co-responsibility [0.03%]
对动物伦理和包容性“同一健康”治理H5N1泛 zoondemic：从捕杀动物到共担责任的修正意见
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/phe/phag002.]. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press.
Published Erratum
Public health ethics. 2026 May 6;19(2):phag007. DOI:10.1093/phe/phag007 2026