Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime [0.03%]
说真话的人经得起时间的考验 谎言家作证时更容易出现矛盾 即使过了几个月也是如此
Divya Sukumar,Kimberley A Wade,Jacqueline S Hodgson
Divya Sukumar
When deceptive suspects are unaware of the evidence the police hold against them, they contradict that evidence more than truthful suspects do-a useful cue to deception. But given that, over time, truthful suspects might forget the past and...
Joshua J Reynolds,Victoria Estrada-Reynolds,Narina Nunez
Joshua J Reynolds
Although there is a substantial body of work examining attitudes towards the police, no measure has been developed to consistently capture citizens' beliefs regarding police legitimacy. Given that police conduct has garnered a great deal of...
Valerie P Hans,Rebecca K Helm,Valerie F Reyna
Valerie P Hans
Legal systems often require the translation of qualitative assessments into quantitative judgments, yet the qualitative-to-quantitative conversion is a challenging, understudied process. We conducted an experimental test of predictions from...
Do risk assessment tools help manage and reduce risk of violence and reoffending? A systematic review [0.03%]
风险评估工具能帮助管理及减少暴力行为和再犯的风险吗?系统综述
Jodi L Viljoen,Dana M Cochrane,Melissa R Jonnson
Jodi L Viljoen
Although it is widely believed that risk assessment tools can help manage risk of violence and offending, it is unclear what evidence exists to support this view. As such, we conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis. To identif...
Real-world use of the risk-need-responsivity model and the level of service/case management inventory with community-supervised offenders [0.03%]
风险需责模型和量刑/个案管理模式在社区监管矫正对象中的运用及效果评估研究
Heather L Dyck,Mary Ann Campbell,Julie L Wershler
Heather L Dyck
The risk-need-responsivity model (RNR; Bonta & Andrews, 2017) has become a leading approach for effective offender case management, but field tests of this model are still required. The present study first assessed the predictive validity o...
Eyewitness identification performance on showups improves with an additional-opportunities instruction: Evidence for present-absent criteria discrepancy [0.03%]
额外机会指令可提升目击者一对一辨认中的识别性能:现有研究与实证结果不一致的证据
Andrew M Smith,Gary L Wells,R C L Lindsay et al.
Andrew M Smith et al.
We tested the proposition that when eyewitnesses find it difficult to recognize a suspect (as in a culprit-absent showup), eyewitnesses accept a weaker match to memory for making an identification. We tie this proposition to the basic recog...
Juvenile probation officers' evaluation of traumatic event exposures and traumatic stress symptoms as responsivity factors in risk assessment and case planning [0.03%]
少年司法中的创伤暴露和创伤后应激症状在风险评估和个案计划中的作用
Evan D Holloway,Keith R Cruise,Samantha L Morin et al.
Evan D Holloway et al.
Juvenile probation officers (JPOs) are increasingly using risk/needs assessments to evaluate delinquency risk, identify criminogenic needs and specific responsivity factors, and use this information in case planning. Justice-involved youth ...
The home-field advantage and the perils of professional judgment: Evaluating the performance of the Static-99R and the MnSOST-3 in predicting sexual recidivism [0.03%]
本土优势与专业判断的弊端:评估Static-99R和MnSOST-3预测性再犯的性能
Grant Duwe,Michael Rocque
Grant Duwe
When sex offenders in Minnesota are assigned risk levels prior to their release from prison, correctional staff frequently exercise professional judgment by overriding the presumptive risk level per an offender's score on the Minnesota Sex ...
Comparative Study
Law and human behavior. 2018 Jun;42(3):269-279. DOI:10.1037/lhb0000277 2018
Police managers' self-control and support for organizational justice [0.03%]
警察管理人员的自我控制及其支持组织正义感的态度
Scott E Wolfe,Justin Nix,Bradley A Campbell
Scott E Wolfe
Recent policing research has identified a positive relationship between line-level officers' perceptions of organizational justice and their adherence to agency goals and job satisfaction. However, we have little understanding of the factor...
Who deserves basic rights? People condone violations of procedural and physical rights in the treatment of terrorist suspects [0.03%]
谁应该享有基本权利?人们容忍在对待恐怖嫌疑人时对其程序性和物质性权利的侵犯
Anna-Kaisa Newheiser,Tina C DeMarco
Anna-Kaisa Newheiser
Public discourse regarding the treatment of terrorist suspects typically emphasizes utilitarian "greater-good" justifications related to ensuring public safety. By contrast, we hypothesized that laypeople's judgments of how suspected terror...