Lay evaluations of police and civilian use of force: Action severity scales [0.03%]
警察与平民使用武力的评判标准：行动严重性量表
Bradley D Celestin,John K Kruschke
Bradley D Celestin
In modern societies, citizens cede the legitimate use of violence to law enforcement agents who act on their behalf. However, little is known about the extent to which lay evaluations of forceful actions align with or diverge from official ...
Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race [0.03%]
陪审员的认知损耗及其在审判过程中的表现与陪审团构成和被告种族的关系
Liana Peter-Hagene
Liana Peter-Hagene
Racial diversity in juries, meant to ensure representation of minority voices, can also reduce racial bias in verdicts and improve group performance during deliberation (Sommers, 2006). Although jury diversity might increase cognitive deple...
Yueran Yang,Laura Smalarz,Sarah A Moody et al.
Yueran Yang et al.
This article presents an expected cost model for evaluating and comparing the performance of eyewitness identification procedures. The model estimates the expected cost of an identification procedure in order to quantify how well the proced...
Who said what and when? A timeline approach to eliciting information and intelligence about conversations, plots, and plans [0.03%]
谁在什么时候说过什么？一种用于获取关于对话、阴谋和计划的信息与情报的时间轴方法
Lorraine Hope,Fiona Gabbert,Max Kinninger et al.
Lorraine Hope et al.
The verbal content of interactions (what was said and who said what) can be important as evidence and intelligence information. Across 3 empirical studies, we examined memory for details of an overheard (Experiment 1) or witnessed (Experime...
Reoffending rates in a U.K. community sample of individuals with convictions for indecent images of children [0.03%]
英国社区样本中涉及儿童淫秽图像犯罪人的再犯率
Ian A Elliott,Rebecca Mandeville-Norden,Janine Rakestrow-Dickens et al.
Ian A Elliott et al.
Although they remain a relatively small proportion of all identified sex offenders, there is increasing concern about individuals with offenses relating to indecent images of children (IIOC) online. This study examined the reoffending rates...
Proximal predictors of gun violence among adolescent males involved in crime [0.03%]
与犯罪有关的青少年男性的枪支暴力的近端预测因素
Zachary R Rowan,Carol A Schubert,Thomas A Loughran et al.
Zachary R Rowan et al.
The growing public health and legal concerns regarding gun violence has led to a call for research that investigates risk factors for gun violence across a variety of domains. Individual and sociocontextual risk factors have been associated...
Faith E Gifford,Michael D Reisig
Faith E Gifford
Legal socialization researchers have been paying more attention to legal cynicism, but the manner in which the concept was operationalized varied greatly and measurement properties of existing scales did not always meet traditional threshol...
Investigative utility of the Cognitive Interview: Describing and finding perpetrators [0.03%]
认知访谈的调查效用：描述和寻找犯罪嫌疑人
Geri E Satin,Ronald P Fisher
Geri E Satin
The Cognitive Interview (CI) has been shown repeatedly to enhance witness recall of events. The current study examined two conspicuous holes in the CI literature: (a) whether the CI improves witness descriptions specifically of a perpetrato...
A drug court by any other name? An analysis of problem-solving court programs [0.03%]
改头换面的禁毒法庭？问题解决型法院项目的分析报告
Kimberly A Kaiser,Kirby Rhodes
Kimberly A Kaiser
Beginning with the original drug court model, specialized court programs (SCPs) have expanded to address a variety of offense-related problems, such as domestic violence courts, mental health courts, veteran courts, and homeless courts. To ...
"Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis": Correction to Oberlader et al. (2016) [0.03%]
致Oberlader等（2016）的更正：“基于内容的方法区分真实陈述和虚假陈述的有效性：元分析”
Reports an error in "Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis" by Verena A. Oberlader, Christoph Naefgen, Judith Koppehele-Gossel, Laura Quinten, Rainer Banse and Alexander F. Schmi...
Published Erratum
Law and human behavior. 2019 Apr;43(2):165. DOI:10.1037/lhb0000324 2019