Race and ethnicity in the courtroom workgroup: Can diversifying the court solve racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes? [0.03%]
庭審工作群中的种族和族裔问题：法院的多元化能解决案件结果中的种族及族裔差异吗？
Rachel Bowman,Ojmarrh Mitchell,Daniela Oramas Mora et al.
Rachel Bowman et al.
Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in criminal court outcomes in the United States are a persistent problem, one that is often attributed to the considerable discretion court actors have in determining whether, and ...
The justice motive: Retributive and restorative factors affect public evaluations of child protection [0.03%]
正义动机：报复性和恢复性的因素影响公众对儿童保护的评价
Stacey Politis,Diane Sivasubramaniam,Taylor Gogan et al.
Stacey Politis et al.
Objective: The perceptions of justice literature suggests the public expect child protection (CP) to punish those who maltreat children. However, CP implements restorative, rather than retributive interventions. We invest...
A risk-need-responsivity (RNR)-informed systematic review of needs during the pretrial period [0.03%]
基于风险-需求-反应性(RNR)的审前期间需求的系统评价
Sydney Ingel,Evan M Lowder,Peyton Frye et al.
Sydney Ingel et al.
Objective: Pretrial risk assessments are becoming increasingly popular in the United States. Despite the importance of assessing and intervening around "needs" in the risk-need-responsivity model, few pretrial risk assess...
When we do not care about what happens to "criminals": How character judgments influence indifference to incidental suffering in the criminal justice system [0.03%]
当我们对罪犯漠不关心时会发生什么：性格判断如何影响我们对刑事司法系统中他人遭遇的冷漠程度
Anna C Barron,Colleen M Berryessa,Melissa de Vel-Palumbo
Anna C Barron
Objective: Sometimes people fail to sympathize-and may even relish-when people in the criminal justice system experience harms such as police brutality or inadequate care while in custody. These are harms that occur incid...
From culture blind to culturally informed: Coverage of sociocultural identities in U.S.-based forensic psychology journals, 2016-2020 [0.03%]
从漠视文化到基于文化的视角：美国法医心理学期刊对社会文化身份的报道（2016—2020年）
Amanda M Fanniff,Leila N Wallach,Taylor York et al.
Amanda M Fanniff et al.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the degree to and manner in which research published in four forensic psychology journals in the years 2016-2020 addressed sociocultural identities. ...
Psychiatric symptoms and criminogenic risk in people with mental illness: Comparing patients across forensic and nonforensic settings [0.03%]
精神疾病患者的犯罪风险与精神病症状：跨司法和非司法环境下的患者比较研究
Angelea D Bolaños,Faith Scanlon,Robert D Morgan et al.
Angelea D Bolaños et al.
Objective: Because approximately 50% of psychiatric patients present with current or past criminal legal involvement, we aimed to compare factors associated with criminal legal involvement across three inpatient psychiatr...
Are feigning screens "competent to stand trial"? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test, Atypical Presentation Scales, and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology [0.03%]
演技性虚假陈述“不负刑事责任能力”吗？米勒精神病态症状评估量表、非典型表现量表和结构化造假症状清单的系统综述与元分析研究
Nishant Krishnan,Michael D Trood,Janet Ruffles et al.
Nishant Krishnan et al.
Objective: Competency to stand trial evaluations represent the most common psycho-legal assessment in the United States. Notwithstanding, evaluators may face additional complexity when they suspect malingering or overrepo...
Field reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised among life-sentenced prisoners in Sweden: A follow-up study [0.03%]
瑞典生活囚犯中的精神病评定清单修订版的现场可靠性：一项随访研究
Johanna Kindbom Land,Ronald van den Berg,Björn Hofvander et al.
Johanna Kindbom Land et al.
Objective: The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) is widely used in forensic and clinical contexts, yet its reliability in high-stakes legal settings remains uncertain. In Sweden, it is routinely applied in court-order...
Framing legal fines: How message presentation affects severity perceptions [0.03%]
论法律罚金的表达方式：信息呈现如何影响人们对处罚严重程度的认知
Eunny Kim,Kwanho Suk
Eunny Kim
Objective: In many public settings, legal notices communicate fines for minor violations, often using different phrasings such as "up to," "maximum," "or below," or "range." This research examines whether these wording di...
Law and human behavior in the age of open science and diversity, equity, and inclusion [0.03%]
开放科学时代的法律与人类行为以及平等和包容性
Bradley D McAuliff
Bradley D McAuliff
The 50th anniversary of Law and Human Behavior provides a unique opportunity to reflect on the journal's past and future. During my term as editor-in-chief (2019-2024), our editorial team advanced two key initiatives: promoting open science...