Corona – Krise – Kritik: Eine Kontroverse im Berliner Journal für Soziologie [0.03%]
冠状病毒危机批判：《柏林社会学杂志》上的争议争端
Benjamin Seyd
Benjamin Seyd
[The coronavirus pandemic-a politically explosive catastropheLa pandémie de coronavirus - une catastrophe explosive] [0.03%]
新冠疫情：政治爆炸性灾难
Klaus Dörre
Klaus Dörre
The corona pandemic is a medical catastrophe that is intricately intertwined with an epochal economic-ecological double or "pincer-grip" crisis - thus goes the central thesis of this contribution. COVID-19 is defined as an "external shock" ...
Stephan Lessenich
Stephan Lessenich
The COVID-19 pandemic does not herald a new social era. Rather, the mechanisms of dealing with the pandemic, as far as they can be identified at this point, bear testimony to the structural socio-economic and socio-political crisis that mus...
[Path dependency, bifurcation points and the role of sociology. A sociological attempt at interpreting the corona crisisDépendance au sentier, points de bifurcation et le rôle de la sociologie. Une tentative d'interprétation sociologique de la crise du coronavirus] [0.03%]
[path依赖性、分叉点和 sociology的作用。对冠状病毒危机的社会学解读尝试]
Hartmut Rosa
Hartmut Rosa
The contribution begins by attempting to specify the corona crisis' essence and form by means of acceleration theory. In so doing, the diagnosis of a politically induced, objectively measurable deceleration is pivotal. In a second step, the...
Benjamin Seyd
Benjamin Seyd
Elective affinity or comprehensive contradiction? Reflections on capitalism and democracy in the time of finance-dominated accumulation and austerity states [0.03%]
互补性还是综合性矛盾？兼论金融主宰积累与紧缩政策下的资本主义与民主关系问题
Bob Jessop
Bob Jessop
The often-asserted relation of formal adequacy or elective affinity between capitalism and democracy is historically contingent on both sides of the relation. First, it holds for what Weber called "formally rational capitalism" - which is t...
R Munz,R Ulrich
R Munz