University of pennsylvania law review文章索引

期刊名：University of pennsylvania law review

缩写：

ISSN：0041-9907

e-ISSN：N/A

IF/分区：2.9/Q1

共收录本刊相关文章索引31条

Considerations in the regulation of biological research [0.03%] 论生物研究的规范性问题

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1978 Jun;126(6):1420-46. DOI: 1978

Laetrile: statutory and constitutional limitations on the regulation of ineffective drugs [0.03%] 关于无效药物管制的立法和宪法限制——莱特希尔案之剖析

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1978 Nov;127(1):233-72. DOI: 1978

Finding a right in state constitutions for community treatment of the mentally ill [0.03%] 从州宪法中为精神病人社区治疗寻找正当理由

Antony B Klapper Antony B Klapper

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1993 Dec;142(2):739-835. DOI: 1993

Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one [0.03%] 堕胎政治：“为一个人写作”

Susan R Estrich,Kathleen M Sullivan Susan R Estrich

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1989 Nov;138(1):119-55. DOI: 1989

Defining an "adequate" package of health care benefits [0.03%] 界定“适当”的医疗保健福利包

Paul E Kalb Paul E Kalb

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1992 May;140(5):1987-98. DOI: 1992

Combining deliberation and fair representation in community health decisions [0.03%] 在社区卫生决策中结合审议和公平代表性

Jack H Nagel Jack H Nagel

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1992 May;140(5):1965-85. DOI: 1992

Political accountability in health care rationing: in search of a New Jerusalem [0.03%] 医疗卫生资源配置中的政治责任：构建“应许之地”的探索之路

Howard M Leichter Howard M Leichter

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1992 May;140(5):1939-63. DOI: 1992

Consumer expectations and access to health care: a commentary [0.03%] 消费者健康期望与其医疗保健的可及性：短评

Paul T Menzel Paul T Menzel

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1992 May;140(5):1919-22. DOI: 1992

Consumer expectations and access to health care [0.03%] 消费者预期与医疗保健的可及性

Leslie Pickering Francis Leslie Pickering Francis

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1992 May;140(5):1881-917. DOI: 1992

Rationing without justice: children and the American health system [0.03%] 缺乏公正的医疗分配：美国儿童的健康问题

Sara Rosenbaum Sara Rosenbaum

University of Pennsylvania law review. 1992 May;140(5):1859-80. DOI: 1992