首页 文献索引 SCI期刊 AI助手
条件筛选
相关性 最新发表 最早发表
全文 标题 期刊 作者
Clinical Trial Case Reports Meta-Analysis RCT Review Systematic Review
Classical Article Case Reports Clinical Study Clinical Trial Clinical Trial Protocol Comment Comparative Study Editorial Guideline Letter Meta-Analysis Multicenter Study Observational Study Randomized Controlled Trial Review Systematic Review
模糊 精准
{{tag.shortname||tag.name}}:{{getFilterLabel(field)}} Clear All
Amelia Campos-Saénz de Santamaría,Javier Pérez-Santana,François Croset et al. Amelia Campos-Saénz de Santamaría et al.
This document is the result of the joint efforts of residents from various hospitals nationwide, in collaboration with senior physicians with extensive HF expertise and members of the Working Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine.
Yu-Long Zhang,Jia-Wei Huang,Kai-Yu Li et al. Yu-Long Zhang et al.
All models demonstrated >80% consistency with senior physicians and >70% consistency with junior physicians.In the binary classification task, the models achieved accuracies of 94.70%, 96.03%, 96.03%, and 94.70%, respectively.
Pierre-Marie Roger,Nicolas Lesaffre,Timothé Thiel et al. Pierre-Marie Roger et al.
The mean score/5 [± std deviation] per clinical case was 2.7 ± 1.9, with a difference between UTI and respiratory infections: 3.5 ± 1.7 versus 3.0 ± 1.1, p = 0.043, and a higher score for senior physicians as compared to residents: 2.9 ± 1.8 versus 2.0 ± 1.9, p = 0.019.
Jun Xu,Junjie Wang,Junjun Li et al. Jun Xu et al.
Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, area under the curve (AUC), and agreement across LLMs and physicians.GPT-4o, using the 'OR rule method,' achieved 65% accuracy and 47% sensitivity, comparable to intermediate physicians but lower than senior physicians (accuracy: 72%, p = 0.045; sensitivity...Gemini-GPT, combining GPT-4, GPT-4o, and Gemini, achieved an AUC of 0.69, similar to senior physicians (AUC: 0.72, p = 0.35), with 68% accuracy, outperforming junior and intermediate physicians while remaining comparable to senior physicians (p = 0.78)....However, its sensitivity (58%) was lower than senior physicians (p = 0.0097). LLMs demonstrated higher inter-model agreement (κ = 0.59-0.70) than inter-physician agreement, especially among junior physicians (κ = 0.15).
Ryunosuke Noda,Kenichiro Tanabe,Daisuke Ichikawa et al. Ryunosuke Noda et al.
Eight junior physicians without board certification and ten senior physicians with board certification answered these questions twice: first unaided, then with the opportunity to revise their answers based on GPT-4's outputs. GPT-4 correctly answered 77.8% of the questions....Before using GPT-4, junior physicians had a median (interquartile range) proportion of correct answers of 53.3% (48.3-53.3), senior physicians 65.6% (60.6-66.7).
Davut Deniz Uzun,Felix Hezel,Stefan Mohr et al. Davut Deniz Uzun et al.
In terms of professional roles, there was an even split between senior physicians (34%) and residents (34%), followed by consultants (25%) or heads of departments (8%).
Xiuling Huang,Shan Huang,Changfeng Dong et al. Xiuling Huang et al.
The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for independent diagnoses made by primary, intermediate, and senior physicians were 24.3%, 29.1%, and 33.8% for sensitivity; 100% for specificity; and 25.3%, 30.0%, and 34.7% for accuracy, respectively....The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for AI-independent diagnosis (0.845) was significantly higher than that for primary, intermediate, and senior physicians (0.622, 0.645, and 0.669, respectively; P
Lindsey E Carlasare,Samuel Lin,Purva Shah et al. Lindsey E Carlasare et al.
Purpose: This study aimed to examine prevalence of loneliness among senior physicians and identify associations between high loneliness and other personal and social factors. Methods: This cross-sectional survey of physicians aged ≥65 was conducted between February 26 and March 12, 2024....Conclusions: Nearly 1 in 5 senior physicians experience loneliness, and high loneliness is associated with personal and social factors.
R Vinci,L P Stoppino,S Piscone et al. R Vinci et al.
Reproducibility between the two senior physicians had a kappa of 0.68 (CI 0.62-1.00), while between the two junior physicians had a kappa of 0.61 (CI 0.33-0.89). The intra-observer reproducibility progressively decreased between observers with different experience.
Yuwei Bao,Chenyang Lu,Qun Yang et al. Yuwei Bao et al.
A composite nomogram was developed, and its predictive accuracy was benchmarked against that of junior and senior physicians using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).
耗时 0.10426 秒,为您在 48229835 条记录里面共找到 409 篇文章 [XML]