首页 文献索引 SCI期刊 AI助手
条件筛选
相关性 最新发表 最早发表
全文 标题 期刊 作者
Clinical Trial Case Reports Meta-Analysis RCT Review Systematic Review
Classical Article Case Reports Clinical Study Clinical Trial Clinical Trial Protocol Comment Comparative Study Editorial Guideline Letter Meta-Analysis Multicenter Study Observational Study Randomized Controlled Trial Review Systematic Review
模糊 精准
{{tag.shortname||tag.name}}:{{getFilterLabel(field)}} Clear All
Bo Fan,Luxin Zhang,Hepeng Cui et al. Bo Fan et al.
Moreover, to benefit from the clinical implications of the predictive model, an easy-to-use risk calculator tool for UR was developed online ( https://zluxin.shinyapps.io/make_web/ ) based on the GBM model.
Musab Egaimi,Pierfrancesco Corvo,Hasan Al Houri et al. Musab Egaimi et al.
Objective The objective of this study is to develop and technically validate an integrated ACS risk calculator that streamlines the computation of TIMI, GRACE, and Mehran scores while demonstrating the utility of AI-assisted coding in clinical applications....Conclusion This study validates an integrated ACS risk calculator that unifies three established models within a single digital tool. It enhances workflow efficiency and demonstrates the practical value of AI-assisted, clinician-led development in cardiovascular decision support.
Fabrizio Di Maida,Luca Lambertini,Antonio Andrea Grosso et al. Fabrizio Di Maida et al.
Introduction and objectives: To provide a risk-adapted strategy to manage prostate cancer (PCa) patients eligible for curative surgery by developing an individualized risk calculator to predict oncologic outcomes.
Rita Dexter,Kristin Kostick-Quenet,Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby Rita Dexter
In this paper, we present data from a multi-site, 5-year study focused on the development and deployment of an algorithmic risk calculator (HeartMate 3 Risk Score) into a validated and efficacy tested clinical decision support system (CDSS) for patients and clinicians engaging in shared decision making
Iván Ferraz-Amaro,Elena Heras-Recuero,Antonia de Vera-González et al. Iván Ferraz-Amaro et al.
FIB-4 was significantly associated with higher values of the cardiovascular risk calculator SCORE2 but not with carotid atherosclerosis. It was also significantly related to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.
Aparna Gupta,Parul Goyal,Smita Roy et al. Aparna Gupta et al.
Using online American Heart Association Atherosclerotic CVD (AHA ASCVD) risk calculator and guidelines, patients were classified into "Low" and "High" risk categories. Serum sRAGE was assayed using sandwich ELISA technology.
Trevor Williams,Jim Gold,James Waltz et al. Trevor Williams et al.
Tasks also predicted psychosis risk calculator scores (Adjusted R 2 = .12), with the two unique predictors being positive symptom task variables associated with updating beliefs regarding environmental volatility.
Masafumi Inomata,Hideki Endo,Tomonori Akagi et al. Masafumi Inomata et al.
The numbers of LDG and LLAR were obtained, and morbidity and mortality rates were evaluated using a standardized morbidity/mortality ratio (SMR), i.e. the ratio of the observed number of incidences to expected number of incidences calculated by the risk calculator previously developed by the NCD.
Mark E Cohen,Yaoming Liu,Bruce L Hall et al. Mark E Cohen et al.
Objective: To assess the accuracy of the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator (RC) when applied to subsets of high-risk patients. Background: The ...
耗时 0.09566 秒,为您在 48206918 条记录里面共找到 1431 篇文章 [XML]