首页 正文

Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000002252 Q31.82025

Pilot Study: Development and Evaluation of Validity Evidence of a Low-Cost, Low-Fidelity Hand Model to Teach Clinical Assessment of Small Joint Swelling in Inflammatory Arthritis

低通量、低成本手模型教学小型关节炎性肿胀的临床评估的有效证据的发展和评价:前瞻性研究 翻译改进

Ibtissam Gad  1, Christopher Podgorski  2, Kylie Springer  3, Amita Bishnoi  4, Deborah M Rooney  1, Lisa Zickuhr  5

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 From the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • 2 Park Nicollet Specialty Center, St Louis Park, MN.
  • 3 Henry Ford Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI.
  • 4 Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI.
  • 5 University of Washington in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MN.
  • DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000002252 PMID: 40521998

    摘要 中英对照阅读

    Objective: To create an affordable, easily reproducible, low-fidelity hand model and present a validity argument for its use to support residents' learning to identify inflammatory arthritis.

    Methods: We designed a hand model to simulate small joint swelling and evaluated evidence to support its use using Messick's Framework between April 2023 and April 2024. Rheumatologists nationwide rated our model (content validity). At 2 tertiary institutions, rheumatologists (experts) and internal medicine residents (learners) evaluated 3 sets of models for small joint swelling, and their scores were compared with Mann-Whitney U test (construct validity). Learners applied their skills to 3 patient encounters, and patient versus model scores were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test (predictive validity).

    Results: One set of 2 hand models cost less than US $5 to create. Thirteen rheumatologists rated our model at 7.23 ± 2.52 out of 10 points; 11 of the 13 (84.6%) rheumatologists thought the model was helpful for training learners to examine swollen joints. Median model evaluation scores for 12 experts (98.9%; range, 92.2%-100%) and 32 learners (100%; range, 84.4%-100%) were not significantly different (p = 0.143). The 18 learners who also evaluated patients had a significantly lower median score when evaluating patients versus the hand models (difference 10.0%; range, 5.6-15.6; p < 0.001).

    Conclusion: Content validity evidence supported our model's use in internal medicine training; however, the model needs improvement for greater construct and predictive validity. Our easily constructed, low-cost hand model may be a promising introductory training tool for rheumatology medical education.

    Keywords: exam; examination; hand; inflammatory arthritis; model; physical skills; simulation; simulator; validity or validation; workshop.

    Keywords:clinical assessment; small joint swelling; inflammatory arthritis; hand model

    目标: 创建一个经济实惠、易于复制的低仿真的手模型,并提出其在支持住院医师学习识别炎症性关节炎方面的有效性的论据。

    方法: 我们在2023年4月至2024年4月期间设计了一个模拟小关节肿胀的手模型,并使用梅斯克框架评估了其使用的证据。全国范围内的风湿病专家对我们的手模型进行了评分(内容有效性)。在两家三级医疗机构,风湿病专家和内科住院医师分别评价了三组手模型的小关节肿胀情况,并通过曼-惠特尼U检验比较了他们的得分(结构有效性)。学习者将他们的技能应用于三个病人案例中,然后用威尔科克森符号秩检验比较患者与模型的评分(预测有效性)。

    结果: 一组两个手模型的成本不到5美元。13名风湿病专家对我们的手模型给出了7.23 ± 2.52分(满分10分)。其中84.6%的风湿病专家认为该模型有助于训练学习者检查肿胀关节。对于小关节肿胀情况,12位专家和32位学习者的评分中值没有显著差异(p = 0.143),但是评价患者与手模型时,18名也对患者进行评估的学习者的得分显著降低(差值为10.0%,范围5.6-15.6; p

    结论: 内容有效性证据支持了我们的手模型在内科培训中的使用,然而为了提高结构和预测的有效性,该模型还需要改进。我们简易构建且低成本的手模型可能是风湿病医学教育入门训练工具的一个有前景的选择。

    关键词: 考试;检查;手;炎症性关节炎;模型;物理技能;模拟;验证;研讨会

    关键词:临床评估; 小关节肿胀; 炎性关节炎; 手模型

    翻译效果不满意? 用Ai改进或 寻求AI助手帮助 ,对摘要进行重点提炼
    Copyright © Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Jcr-journal of clinical rheumatology

    缩写:JCR-J CLIN RHEUMATOL

    ISSN:1076-1608

    e-ISSN:1536-7355

    IF/分区:1.8/Q3

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Pilot Study: Development and Evaluation of Validity Evidence of a Low-Cost, Low-Fidelity Hand Model to Teach Clinical Assessment of Small Joint Swelling in Inflammatory Arthritis