首页 正文

The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association. 2025 Mar;41(2):e70039. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70039 Q22.72024

Geographic disparities in unpaid caregiving

无偿照顾的地理差异性分析 翻译改进

Emma Kathryn Boswell  1, Monique J Brown  2, Lorie Donelle  3, Nicholas Yell  1, Taryn Farrell  1, Peiyin Hung  1, Elizabeth Crouch  1

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 University of South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • 2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • 3 Department of Biobehavioral Health & Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
  • DOI: 10.1111/jrh.70039 PMID: 40515480

    摘要 中英对照阅读

    Purpose: An updated, nationally representative examination of rural-urban differences in the experiences, health, and well-being of caregivers is needed; previous research on this topic uses older data or has limited generalizability. This study examines rural-urban differences in the characteristics, experiences, and health of caregivers.

    Methods: The 2021-2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 44,274 unpaid caregivers) was used, with rurality defined according to the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. Chi-square tests compared rural-urban differences in these caregivers' characteristics, including demographic factors, caregiving intensity (e.g., weekly hours spent caregiving, reason for caregiving, past-month ADL/IADL assistance), caregiver's health (e.g., general health status and past month physical health, mental health, and limited activity), and caregiver's health behavior (chronic illness, smoking status, binge drinking, and annual checkups).

    Findings: Compared to urban caregivers, rural caregivers were more likely to have at least one chronic condition (58.3% vs. 53.2%; p < 0.0001), be obese (42.9% vs. 37.5%; p < 0.0001), be a smoker (24.2% vs. 15.5%; p < 0.0001), and less likely to be a binge drinker (12.7% vs. 15.3%; p = 0.003). Compared to urban caregivers, rural caregivers were more likely to report their general health status as fair/poor (20.3% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.0003) and were more likely to report 14 or more days of poor physical health in the past month (15.6% vs. 12.0%, p < 0.0001).

    Conclusions: Understanding geographic disparities in the experiences and context of unpaid caregiving is needed to improve their overall well-being and health. Future research will be necessary to determine factors associated with these outcomes.

    Keywords: informal caregiving; quality of life; rural–urban disparities.

    Keywords:unpaid caregiving; geographic disparities

    目的: 需要进行一项更新的、具有全国代表性的调查,以研究护理人员在城乡之间的经历、健康和福祉差异;之前的有关此主题的研究使用的是较早的数据或具有一般化局限性。本研究考察了城乡之间护理人员的特点、经历和健康的差异。

    方法: 使用了2021-2022年行为风险因素监测系统(n = 44,274名无偿护理人员)的数据,根据2013年国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)城乡分类方案定义城乡差异。通过卡方检验比较了这些护理人员的特点,包括人口统计数据、照护强度(例如,每周花在照护上的时间、照顾的原因、过去一个月的ADL/IADL帮助)、护理人员的健康状况(如总体健康状态和过去一个月内的身体和心理健康以及活动受限)及护理人员的行为习惯(慢性疾病、吸烟情况、酗酒行为及年度体检)。

    发现: 与城市地区的护理人员相比,乡村地区的护理人员更可能患有至少一种慢性病(58.3% vs 53.2%,p

    结论: 为了改善无偿护理人员的整体福祉和健康,我们需要了解他们在不同地理区域的经历和背景差异。未来的研究将有必要确定与这些结果相关的影响因素。

    关键词:非正式照护;生活质量;城乡差异

    关键词:无偿照顾; 地理差异

    翻译效果不满意? 用Ai改进或 寻求AI助手帮助 ,对摘要进行重点提炼
    Copyright © The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Journal of rural health

    缩写:J RURAL HEALTH

    ISSN:0890-765X

    e-ISSN:1748-0361

    IF/分区:2.7/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Geographic disparities in unpaid caregiving