首页 正文

European oral research. 2025 Jan 5;59(1):46-52. doi: 10.26650/eor.20241296069 N/A0.92024

Optimizing the primary stability of dental implants in type IV bone: in-vitro comparison of machine-driven and ratcheting insertion protocols

牙科种植体在IV型骨中主要稳定性的优化:机器驱动与棘轮插入协议的体外比较 翻译改进

Nuri Mert Taysi  1, Aysegul Erten Taysi  1, Pınar Erçal  2, Soner Sismanoglu  3

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 İstanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, İstanbulTürkiye.
  • 2 Altinbas University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, İstanbulTürkiye.
  • 3 Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Dentistry, Famagusta, North Cyprus, Mersin Türkiye.
  • DOI: 10.26650/eor.20241296069 PMID: 40453411

    摘要 中英对照阅读

    Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the effects of various implant insertion techniques on the primary stability of dental implants in both type II and type IV cadaveric bovine.

    Materials and methods: A total of 48 dental implants (BEGO Semados RSX, BEGO Implant Systems GmbH and Co. KG, Germany) with a diameter of 3.75 mm and a length of 12 mm were used in the experiments. Bovine bone ribs were adjusted to mimic type II and type IV bone characteristics. Following the preparation of recipient sites, implants were inserted using three different protocols: machine-driven insertion (Standard group, Std group), ratchet insertion (Ratcheted, R Group), and a combination of both (Std + R group). The Osstell® Beacon device was used to record the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of each implant immediately after insertion. Two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests were used for statistical evaluation.

    Results: Bone type significantly influenced the ISQ values (p<0.05). However, when comparing insertion protocols separately for type II and type IV bone, no significant differences were observed. In type IV bone, both the Std group and R group exhibited significantly lower ISQ values compared to the same groups in type II bone (p<0.05 for each). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in the ISQ values when employing the Std+R technique between the two types of bone.

    Conclusion: Combining machine-driven and ratchet insertion techniques may prove beneficial in optimizing ISQ values in bovine samples simulating type IV bone.

    Keywords: Dental implants; oral surgical procedures; osseointegration; resonance frequency analysis.

    Keywords:dental implants; primary stability; type IV bone

    目的: 本研究的目的是评估不同植入插入技术对二类和四类牛骨标本中牙科种植体初期稳定性的效果。

    材料与方法: 实验共使用了48颗牙科种植体(BEGO Semados RSX,德国BEGO Implant Systems GmbH and Co. KG),直径为3.75毫米,长度为12毫米。调整牛骨肋以模拟二类和四类骨骼特征。在受试部位准备完成后,使用三种不同的插入方案植入种植体:机器驱动插入(标准组,Std 组)、棘轮插入(棘轮组,R 组),以及两者结合的方法(Std + R 组)。使用Osstell® Beacon设备记录每颗种植体插入后的种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)。采用双向方差分析和Bonferroni检验进行统计评估。

    结果: 骨骼类型显著影响了ISQ值(p

    结论: 结合机器驱动和棘轮插入技术可能有助于在模拟四类骨的牛标本中优化种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)值。

    关键词: 牙科植入物;口腔外科手术;骨整合;共振频率分析。

    关键词:种植牙; 初期稳定性; 四型骨质

    翻译效果不满意? 用Ai改进或 寻求AI助手帮助 ,对摘要进行重点提炼
    Copyright © European oral research. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:European oral research

    缩写:

    ISSN:2630-6158

    e-ISSN:2651-2823

    IF/分区:0.9/N/A

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Optimizing the primary stability of dental implants in type IV bone: in-vitro comparison of machine-driven and ratcheting insertion protocols