首页 正文

The American journal of emergency medicine. 2025 May 4:95:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.001 Q22.22025

The impact of a walk-in clinic referral protocol on rabies vaccination emergency department visits

门急诊转诊协议对狂犬病疫苗急诊访问的影响 翻译改进

Elly Glazier  1, L Montana Fleenor  2, Ryan Dillon  2

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America. Electronic address: elly.glazier@vumc.org.
  • 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.001 PMID: 40367735

    摘要 中英对照阅读

    Background: Rabies is fatal without proper management, though rabies is well controlled in the United States, it poses significant strain on emergency departments (ED). Proper rabies care accumulates high costs and multiple clinical encounters. Due to low patient numbers and high medication costs, many outpatient settings don't provide rabies vaccinations, causing patients to return to the ED and endure unnecessary costs. Prior studies have described referral processes for subsequent vaccines but observed limitations. At our institution, a referral protocol was implemented for a walk-in clinic 0.6 miles from the ED, open daily.

    Methods: A retrospective pre- and post-protocol single center study was conducted to evaluate the results of this process improvement protocol. The intervention was the implementation of a referral protocol for subsequent vaccinations. Adults treated in the Adult ED at the study site were included; pre-exposure prophylaxis patients were excluded. The primary outcome of this analysis was the number of return ED visits for subsequent rabies vaccinations following the initial presentation.

    Results: 231 patients were included in the data analyses. The average number of ED visits was 1.722 in the pre-cohort and 1.238 in the post-cohort (p = 0.00042). 63.3 % of patients received the complete rabies vaccination series within the pre-cohort and 69.7 % in the post-cohort.

    Conclusions: Walk-in clinic referral protocol implementation in an adult ED reduced the number of ED visits per exposure and increased the incidence of vaccination regimen completion. Implementation of a referral protocol presents as a favorable strategy in offloading unnecessary ED census in overwhelmed healthcare systems.

    Keywords: Clinic referral; Outpatient setting; Rabies vaccination; Vaccination compliance.

    Keywords:walk-in clinic; referral protocol; rabies vaccination; emergency department visits

    背景:

    狂犬病若不进行适当管理是致命的。虽然在美国狂犬病得到了较好的控制,但它仍然给急诊部门(ED)带来了重大压力。适当的狂犬病护理成本高昂,并且需要多次临床会诊。由于患者数量较少和药物成本较高,许多门诊设置不提供狂犬病疫苗接种服务,导致患者不得不返回急诊室并承担不必要的费用。之前的研究描述了后续疫苗接种的转诊流程,但观察到一些限制。在我们机构中,实施了一项向距离ED 0.6英里的走诊诊所转诊协议,该诊所每日开放。

    方法:

    本研究通过一项单中心回顾性前后对照研究来评估这一过程改进协议的效果。干预措施是为后续疫苗接种实施转诊协议。纳入的研究对象是在研究地点的成人急诊科接受治疗的成年人患者;预防性暴露的患者被排除在外。本次分析的主要结果指标是在初始就诊后返回急诊室进行后续狂犬病疫苗接种的人数。

    结果:

    数据统计包括231名患者。在前对照组中,平均急诊科访问次数为1.722次,在后对照组中为1.238次(P = 0.00042)。在前对照组中有63.3%的患者接受了完整的狂犬病疫苗接种系列,而后对照组中有69.7%。

    结论:

    成人急诊科实施走诊诊所转诊协议减少了每次暴露后的急诊科访问次数,并提高了疫苗接种方案完成率。在超负荷运转的医疗系统中,实施转诊协议是一种减轻不必要的急诊室就诊数量的有效策略。

    关键词:

    诊所转诊;门诊环境;狂犬病疫苗接种;疫苗依从性。

    关键词:走诊诊所; 转诊程序; 狂犬病疫苗接种; 急诊就诊次数

    翻译效果不满意? 用Ai改进或 寻求AI助手帮助 ,对摘要进行重点提炼
    Copyright © The American journal of emergency medicine. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:American journal of emergency medicine

    缩写:AM J EMERG MED

    ISSN:0735-6757

    e-ISSN:1532-8171

    IF/分区:2.2/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    The impact of a walk-in clinic referral protocol on rabies vaccination emergency department visits