首页 正文

Frontiers in oncology. 2025 Mar 3:15:1563015. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1563015 Q23.52024

Low incidence of significant hydrogel spacer rectal wall infiltration: results from an experienced high-volume center

水凝胶 Spacer 显著直肠壁浸润的发生率低:一个有经验的大型中心的数据结果 翻译改进

Sungmin Woo  1, Anton S Becker  1, Aaron E Katz  2, Angela Tong  1, Hebert A Vargas  1, David J Byun  3, Jonathan W Lischalk  4, Jonathan A Haas  5, Michael J Zelefsky  3

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • 2 Department of Urology, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States.
  • 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, New York, NY, United States.
  • 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States.
  • DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1563015 PMID: 40098707

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and degree of rectal wall infiltration (RWI) of spacer gel used during prostate radiotherapy among two practitioners experienced in using rectal spacers.

    Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with prostate cancer who received prostate radiotherapy after hydrogel rectal spacer insertion in August 2023-August 2024 by two experienced practitioners were retrospectively included. Post-implant magnetic resonance imaging examinations were evaluated by two radiologists for RWI: 0 (no abnormality), 1 (rectal wall edema), 2 (superficial RWI), and 3 (deep RWI). Scores 2-3 were considered positive for RWI and their location and degree of RWI (radial, longitudinal, and circumferential) were also categorized. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cohen's Kappa.

    Results: 215 men were included. Agreement was substantial between the radiologists for RWI scores (Kappa, 0.697; 95% confidence interval, 0.594-0.800). RWI scores were 0 in 80.5% (173/215), 1 in 7.9% (17/215), 2 in 10.7% (23/215), and, 3 in 0.9% (2/215) of the men. Altogether, RWI was present (scores 2-3) in 11.6% (25/215), most commonly in the mid-gland and apex with median radial, longitudinal, and circumferential involvement of 3.2 mm, 8.6 mm, and 11.5%. None of these patients demonstrated any significant rectal toxicity.

    Conclusion: RWI was very uncommon for experienced practitioners. The degree of RWI was focal and not associated with increased complications.

    Keywords: hydrogel; magnetic resonance imaging; radiotherapy; rectal wall infiltration; spacer.

    Keywords:rectal wall infiltration

    Copyright © Frontiers in oncology. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Frontiers in oncology

    缩写:FRONT ONCOL

    ISSN:2234-943X

    e-ISSN:

    IF/分区:3.5/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Low incidence of significant hydrogel spacer rectal wall infiltration: results from an experienced high-volume center