首页 正文

Multicenter Study JCO global oncology. 2025 Mar:11:e2400337. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00337 Q23.02025

Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Utilization and Disparities in a Middle-Income Country

乳腺癌中的种系基因检测:中等收入国家的使用及其差异分析 翻译改进

Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza  1, Carlos Barrios  2  3  4, Rafaela Gomes de Jesus  2, Tomas Reinert  3  5, Juliana Giacomazzi  2, Daniela D Rosa  2  3  6, Eduardo Cronemberger  7, Gustavo Werutsky  2  3, José Bines  2  3  8, Geraldo Silva Queiroz  9, Vladmir Cordeiro de Lima  10, Ruffo Freitas-Junior  11, José d'Oliveira Couto Filho  12, Karla Emerenciano  13, Heloisa Resende  14, Susanne Crocamo  15, Brigitte Van Eyll  16, Yeni Neron  17, Vanessa Dybal  18  19, Nicolas Silva Lazaretti  20, Rita de Cassia Costamilan  21, Diocesio Alves Pinto de Andrade  4  22, Clarissa Mathias  23, Giovana Zerwes Vacaro  24, Giuliano Borges  25, Alessandra Menezes Morelle  4, Carlos Alberto Sampaio Filho  18, Max Mano  2, Martina Lichtenfels  2, Sergio D Simon  3  4, Andre P Fay  1  2

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 CAPES Research Fellowship, Postgraduate Program, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • 2 Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • 3 Grupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • 4 Oncoclinicas Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • 5 Centro de Pesquisa da Serra Gaúcha (CEPESG), Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
  • 6 Serviço de Oncologia Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • 7 Centro Regional Integrado de Oncologia (CRIO), Fortaleza, Brazil.
  • 8 Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • 9 Araújo Jorge Hospital, Goiânia, Brazil.
  • 10 A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • 11 Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
  • 12 Londrina Cancer Hospital, Londrina, Brazil.
  • 13 Liga Norte Riograndense, Natal, Brazil.
  • 14 Jardim Amalia Hospital, Volta Redonda, Brazil.
  • 15 Oncoclinicas Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • 16 Dr Arnaldo Cancer Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • 17 Oncology Research Center, Florianopolis, Brazil.
  • 18 Clinic for Multidisciplinary Care in Oncology (Clínica AMO - Assistência Multidisciplinar em Oncologia), Salvador, Brazil.
  • 19 Fiocruz Bahia-Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Salvador, Brazil.
  • 20 Centro Integrado de Terapia Onco-Hematológica, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
  • 21 Caxias do Sul University, Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
  • 22 Ribeirão Preto Oncology Center, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • 23 Bahia Oncology Nucleus, Lauro de Freitas, Brazil.
  • 24 São Vicente de Paulo Hospital, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
  • 25 Clinica de Neoplasia Litoral, Itajaí, Brazil.
  • DOI: 10.1200/GO-24-00337 PMID: 40053901

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Purpose: Low rates of germline genetic testing (GGT) for breast cancer (BC) have been reported globally, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this study, we used real-world data to assess the GGT rate for BC in an LMIC and identified barriers to its use.

    Methods: We analyzed 2,974 newly diagnosed patients with BC from the AMAZONA III study, the largest Brazilian multicenter, prospective BC cohort. GGT rates were determined for the entire cohort and the high-risk hereditary BC group (HR), defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria, between 2019 and 2020. Barriers to GGT performance associated with patient characteristics and health care systems were identified using multivariable Poisson regression model. Values of P < .05 were considered significant.

    Results: In the AMAZONA III cohort, 1,476 (49%) were classified as HR. Genetic counseling was recommended for 521 patients (35% of HR), and 282 (19%) underwent GGT. Notably, 97% of patients with HR treated within the public health care systems and 56% in the private system did not undergo GGT. Age, education, occupation, monthly income, availability of onsite genetic counseling, and treatment at a teaching center were factors associated with GGT uptake (P < .05). Of those tested, 50 (17%) harbored a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant.

    Conclusion: Only 9% of this robust Brazilian BC cohort underwent GGT, highlighting a considerable gap from the current recommendation to test all patients with BC under age 65 years. GGT is underused by patients with HR in both public and private health care systems, with those in the public system being more affected. The disparities and barriers identified emphasize the need for educational interventions and enhanced access to GGT. Prioritizing GGT is critical to improving BC outcomes in LMICs.

    Keywords:Genetic Testing; Breast Cancer; Utilization; Disparities; Middle-Income Country

    Copyright © JCO global oncology. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Jco global oncology

    缩写:

    ISSN:N/A

    e-ISSN:2687-8941

    IF/分区:3.0/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Utilization and Disparities in a Middle-Income Country