首页 正文

Comparative Study Gates open research. 2025 Mar 3:9:5. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.16315.1 0.02025

A comparison of acceptability of contraceptive vaginal rings, pills, and injectables among cisgender women in Kenya and Zimbabwe: protocol for a mixed-methods study

肯尼亚和津巴布韦顺性别女性对避孕阴道环、药片和注射剂的可接受性比较:混合方法研究的方案 翻译改进

Chelsea B Polis  1, Francis O Obare  2, Irene V Bruce  1, Cynthia Banda  3, Lisa B Haddad  1, Antwanette Heyns  4, Petros Isaakidis  5, Mercy Kamupira  4, Terrance Kufakunesu  6, Zachary A Kwena  7, Farai Machinga  8, Regina F Magore  3, Aleck Mapangire  3, Mercy Marimirofa  8, Matheus Mathipa  4, Sanyukta Mathur  9, Mary Mudavanhu  6, Tatenda P Mujuru  3, Prisca Mutero  6, Betty Njoroge  7, Collen Nyatsambo  10, Sarah Okumu  7, Leah Omondi  7, Tevyne Omondi  7, Marlena G Plagianos  1, Greshon Rota  7, Samuel Sithole  3, Bruce Variano  1, J Brady Burnett-Zieman  1, Petina Musara  6, George Odwe  2, Gerald Hangaika  3, Serah Gitome  7, Elizabeth A Bukusi  7  11  12, Kuziwa Kuwenyi  3

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Population Council, New York, New York, 10065, USA.
  • 2 Population Council Kenya, Nairobi, Nairobi County, Kenya.
  • 3 Médecins Sans Frontières, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • 4 IPM South Africa NPC, Population Council, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • 5 Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • 6 Harare Health Research Consortium, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • 7 Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Nairobi County, Kenya.
  • 8 Zimbabwe National Family Planning Council, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • 9 Population Council, Washington, DC, USA.
  • 10 City of Harare, Health Services,, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • 11 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • 12 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.16315.1 PMID: 40041042

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Background: Expanding contraceptive options could better meet users' diverse needs and preferences. Annovera ® is a contraceptive vaginal ring that provides a year of pregnancy prevention while remaining under user control and allowing for regular menstrual cycles. This method may also help to reduce burdens on some health care and supply chain systems. However, knowledge gaps exist regarding initial and ongoing acceptability of contraceptive vaginal rings in African settings.

    Methods: We will undertake an open-label, non-randomized, two-arm, parallel clinical acceptability study with an embedded qualitative component, based in clinics providing contraceptive services in Kenya and Zimbabwe. Women aged 18-45 interested in newly initiating or switching contraception will choose from among all available contraceptive options, including Annovera. We aim to enroll 200 participants selecting Annovera and 200 participants selecting either contraceptive injectables or pills. We will compare method uptake, continuation, and satisfaction over one year. Participants will complete questionnaires administered by study staff during two in-person visits (a screening/enrollment visit, and an end of study visit after 52 weeks of method use or at discontinuation) and four phone appointments (at 4, 12, 24, and 36 weeks of use). We will evaluate used rings for discoloration and residual drug levels. The qualitative component involve in-depth interviews with women in the clinical study, their sexual partners, and their service providers, to further examine drivers of and barriers to interest in and use of contraceptive vaginal rings.

    Discussion: This study will explore acceptability of contraceptive vaginal rings in 'real-world' contraceptive service settings in two African countries. Findings will be based on actual ring use and contextualized via comparison to two other commonly available methods. As vaginal rings are being considered for multiple reproductive health indications, this work can fill key knowledge gaps and empower decision-makers with information needed to inform future investments in reproductive health.

    Keywords: Acceptability; Kenya; Zimbabwe; contraceptive pills; injectables; intravaginal rings; mixed-methods; satisfaction.

    Keywords:contraceptive vaginal rings; pills; injectables; cisgender women; mixed-methods study

    Copyright © Gates open research. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Gates open research

    缩写:

    ISSN:2572-4754

    e-ISSN:

    IF/分区:0.0/

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    A comparison of acceptability of contraceptive vaginal rings, pills, and injectables among cisgender women in Kenya and Zimbabwe: protocol for a mixed-methods study