首页 正文

Review Psychological medicine. 2025 Feb 27:55:e64. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725000315 Q15.92024

Antidepressant efficacy of administering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with psychological and other non-pharmacological methods: a scoping review and meta-analysis

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合心理及其它非药物疗法的抗抑郁疗效:范围综述和元分析 翻译改进

Cristian G Giron  1, Alvin H P Tang  2, Minxia Jin  2  3, Georg S Kranz  2  4

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • 2 Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • 3 Shanghai YangZhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • 4 Mental Health Research Center (MHRC), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725000315 PMID: 40012529

    摘要 Ai翻译

    To optimize the antidepressant efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), it is important to examine the impact of brain state during therapeutic rTMS. Evidence suggests that brain state can modulate the brain's response to stimulation, potentially diminishing antidepressant efficacy if left uncontrolled or enhancing it with inexpensive psychological or other non-pharmacological methods. Thus, we conducted a PRISMA-ScR-based scoping review to pool studies administering rTMS with psychological and other non-pharmacological methods. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 10 July 2024. Inclusion criteria: neuropsychiatric patients underwent rTMS; studies assessed depressive symptom severity; non-pharmacological tasks or interventions were administered during rTMS, or did not include a wash-out period. Of 8,442 studies, 20 combined rTMS with aerobic exercise, bright light therapy, cognitive training or reactivation, psychotherapy, sleep deprivation, or a psychophysical task. Meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted based on change scores on standardized scales. The effect size was large and therapeutic for uncontrolled pretest-posttest comparisons (17 studies, Hedges' g = -1.91, (standard error) SE = 0.45, 95% (confidence interval) CI = -2.80 to -1.03, p < 0.01); medium when studies compared active combinations with sham rTMS plus active non-pharmacological methods (8 studies, g = -0.55, SE = 0.14, 95% CI = -0.82 to -0.28, p < 0.01); and non-significant when active combinations were compared with active rTMS plus sham psychological methods (4 studies, p = 0.96). Attempts to administer rTMS with non-pharmacological methods show promise but have not yet outperformed rTMS alone.

    Keywords: brain state; depression; meta-analysis; psychological interventions; rTMS; transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Keywords:psychological methods; non-pharmacological methods; scoping review; meta-analysis

    Copyright © Psychological medicine. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Psychological medicine

    缩写:PSYCHOL MED

    ISSN:0033-2917

    e-ISSN:1469-8978

    IF/分区:5.9/Q1

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Antidepressant efficacy of administering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with psychological and other non-pharmacological methods: a scoping review and meta-analysis