首页 正文

Techniques in coloproctology. 2025 Jan 23;29(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03098-9 Q32.72024

Margin matters: analyzing the impact of circumferential margin involvement on survival and recurrence after incomplete total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

切缘距离的把握:不足的全直肠系膜切除术中 circumferential resection margin 对直肠癌患者预后和复发的影响分析 翻译改进

A Alipouriani  1, F Almadi  1, D R Rosen  1, D Liska  1, A E Kanters  1, K Ban  1, E Gorgun  1, S R Steele  2  3

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • 2 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. steeles3@ccf.org.
  • 3 Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Main Campus Submarket, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. steeles3@ccf.org.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03098-9 PMID: 39847185

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Background: Incomplete mesorectal excision during rectal cancer surgery often leads to positive circumferential margins, with uncertain prognostic impacts. This study examines whether negative margins can mitigate the poorer prognosis typically associated with incomplete total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer surgery, thus potentially challenging the prevailing emphasis on complete mesorectal excision.

    Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma with incomplete TME at a single center from 2010 to 2022. Patients were stratified by margin status as determined by pathologic analysis into three groups: involved, not involved with closest margin distance ≤ 2 mm, and not involved with closest margin distance > 2 mm. Outcomes included recurrence and survival. Effects of neoadjuvant therapy protocols on margin status were also assessed.

    Results: From 2010 to 2022, 7941 patients underwent proctectomy for rectal cancer, with 236 (3%) having incomplete TME. The median age of these patients was 64 years, and 63% were male. Overall, margin involvement was observed in 54 (23%) patients. The median tumor size was 3.05 cm (interquartile range (IQR): 2-6) for the whole group. Involved margins (23.2%) had reduced overall survival (60.5 months versus 87.3 months, p < 0.001), increased local recurrence (20.4% versus 9.4%, p = 0.024), and lower disease-free survival (45.2 versus 58.9 months, p = 0.006) versus uninvolved margins. Margin involvement was prognostic for decreased survival even after adjusting for confounders (p < 0.05). Among uninvolved margins, distance (> 2 mm versus ≤ 2 mm) did not affect outcomes. Total neoadjuvant therapy (versus standard chemoradiation) was associated with lower involved margins (p = 0.007).

    Conclusions: Positive margins retain negative prognostic impact with incomplete TME. Optimization of surgical resection remains vital. Total neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a lower rate of margin involvement.

    Keywords: Incomplete TME; Margin status; Mesorectal excision; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal adenocarcinoma.

    Keywords:total mesorectal excision; rectal cancer; survival; recurrence

    Copyright © Techniques in coloproctology. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Techniques in coloproctology

    缩写:TECH COLOPROCTOL

    ISSN:1123-6337

    e-ISSN:1128-045X

    IF/分区:2.7/Q3

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Margin matters: analyzing the impact of circumferential margin involvement on survival and recurrence after incomplete total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer