首页 正文

Case Reports Transfusion. 2024 Dec 22. doi: 10.1111/trf.18098 Q32.02025

How do we engage with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community in blood donation and research? Reflections from the Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility study

如何吸引男同性恋、双性恋和男男性行为者参与献血和研究?来自评估献血者个体差异和重新审视献血资格标准研究的反思 翻译改进

Lauren A Crowder  1, Rita Reik  2, Susan L Stramer  3, Barbee I Whitaker  4, Renata Buccheri  5  6, Karla G Zurita  5, Nick Gehrig  7, Susan Forbes  2, Rodney Wilson  8, Suchitra Pandey  9, Brian Custer  5  6

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Independent Consultant, Hanover, Maryland, USA.
  • 2 OneBlood, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  • 3 Independent Consultant, North Potomac, Maryland, USA.
  • 4 US Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, Maryland, USA.
  • 5 Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • 6 Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • 7 Vitalant, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
  • 8 America Red Cross, Washington, DC, USA.
  • 9 Stanford Blood Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • DOI: 10.1111/trf.18098 PMID: 39710622

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Background: The Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility (ADVANCE) study was a multicenter cross-organizational collaboration to collect data to inform possible changes in blood donor selection criteria for men who have sex with men. Multiple recruitment approaches were used, and these may be applicable to current efforts in LGBTQ+ community engagement to recruit new blood donors.

    Methods: Fieldwork for ADVANCE was a partnership between blood collection organizations (BCOs) and LGBTQ+ community organizations. First, we had to establish relationships with these organizations based on trust and commitment to common objectives. We developed recruitment materials for online and printed distribution. We worked directly with organizations in each community to tailor outreach. Approaches changed over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Results: The study website was a portal for general information about donation policy, the study itself, scheduling study visits, and news stories. It was important to evolve outreach messages and approaches over time. Study team members created changing content and posting schedules on the website and social media platforms. We also worked with community and social media influencers to raise community awareness about the study. Later in the pandemic, we were able to recruit at in-person community events. These in-person events were our most successful outreach.

    Discussion: The partnerships with LGBTQ+ community organizations, diversity promotion groups, and other members of the community were instrumental in making ADVANCE a success. The approaches we used for the study may be valuable for BCO outreach to attract new blood donors.

    Keywords: blood center operations; donors; health research methodology.

    Keywords:blood donation; transgender community; gay community

    Copyright © Transfusion. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Transfusion

    缩写:TRANSFUSION

    ISSN:0041-1132

    e-ISSN:1537-2995

    IF/分区:2.0/Q3

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    How do we engage with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community in blood donation and research? Reflections from the Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility study