首页 正文

Journal of physical activity & health. 2024 Dec 4;22(1):78-84. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0286 Q22.92024

Evaluating a Community-Based Walking Program: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Community Capacity

基于社区的步行项目的评估:社区能力混合方法评价 翻译改进

Lindsay Spitz  1, Roy Valenzuela  2, Jennifer J Salinas  2

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 L. Frederick Francis Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
  • 2 Department of Social Work, College of Health Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
  • DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0286 PMID: 39631384

    摘要 中英对照阅读

    The Border Coalition for Fitness (BCF) is a university-community-based partnership that aims to improve physical activity rates in El Paso, Texas, via walking challenges. This mixed-methods program evaluation assessed the BCF's efforts to expand the El Paso community's capacity to support physical activity through the walking challenge campaign. Informants were divided between members, which was subdivided into BCF members and team captains, and walking challenge participants. Informants completed demographic and community capacity questionnaires that assessed 3 constructs: leadership (L), resources (R), and ability, and commitment to organizing action (C). Participants for this study were recruited by email through participant and member listservs. Of the 2000 participants with active emails, 102 agreed to participate. Quantitative results (n = 102) revealed high ratings across all constructs; however, BCF members consistently rated each construct higher than team captains (members L: 9.71; R: 9.50; C: 9.36 vs community leadership L: 7.97; R: 7.72; C: 7.59). BCF members (n = 5) and former walking challenge participants (n = 3) completed semistructured interviews. While qualitative results revealed BCF leadership is effective, programming is appropriately resourced, and the BCF does drives sustainable action in the community, there were areas the participants identify as areas that needed improvement. Specifically, participants felt that membership recruitment and retention should be improved, and that membership should include more community members and challenge participants.

    Keywords: community health; community-based participatory research; program evaluation; steps.

    Keywords:mixed-methods assessment; community capacity

    边境健身联盟(BCF)是一个以大学和社区为基础的合作组织,旨在通过步行挑战活动提高德克萨斯州埃尔帕索市的体育活动率。这项混合方法项目评估了BCF在扩大埃尔帕索社区支持体育活动的能力方面的努力,特别是在步行挑战运动方面。受访者被分为成员组(进一步细分为BCF成员和团队队长)以及步行挑战参与者。受访者完成了人口统计学调查问卷和社区能力问卷,这些问卷分别评估了三个构想:领导力(L)、资源(R)和组织行动能力和承诺(C)。这项研究的参与者通过邮件列表邀请参与,其中2000名有活跃邮箱地址的参与者中有102人同意参加。定量结果(n = 102)显示在所有构想上都有很高的评分;然而,BCF成员始终比团队队长对每个构想给出更高的评价(成员领导力L:9.71;资源R:9.50;组织行动能力和承诺C:9.36 vs 社区领导力L:7.97;资源R:7.72;组织行动能力和承诺C:7.59)。BCF成员(n = 5)和前步行挑战参与者(n = 3)完成了半结构化访谈。虽然定性结果显示BCF的领导有效,项目得到了适当的资源配置,并且BCF推动了社区内的可持续活动,但参与者也指出了需要改进的地方。具体来说,他们认为会员招募和保留方面应得到改善,并建议会员组应该包括更多的社区成员和挑战参与者。

    关键词: 社区健康;基于社区的参与性研究;项目评估;步数。

    关键词:社区步行项目; 混合方法评估; 社区能力

    翻译效果不满意? 用Ai改进或 寻求AI助手帮助 ,对摘要进行重点提炼
    Copyright © Journal of physical activity & health. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Journal of physical activity & health

    缩写:J PHYS ACT HEALTH

    ISSN:1543-3080

    e-ISSN:1543-5474

    IF/分区:2.9/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Evaluating a Community-Based Walking Program: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Community Capacity