首页 正文

Cancers. 2024 Oct 25;16(21):3597. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213597 Q24.42025

Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Endoluminal Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy (EVAC) for Anastomotic Leakage After Oesophagectomy

新辅助治疗对食管切除术后吻合口漏内镜下负压封闭引流疗效的影响 翻译改进

Catharina Fahrenkrog  1, Sorin Miftode  2, Ahmed Al-Mawsheki  2, Fadl Alfarawan  2, Stella Wilters  1, Maximilian Bockhorn  1  2, Nader El-Sourani  1  3

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Universitätsmedizin Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
  • 2 Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, 26133 Oldenburg, Germany.
  • 3 Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
  • DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213597 PMID: 39518039

    摘要 中英对照阅读

    Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication after oesophagectomy. Endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure therapy (EVAC) has been increasingly used as a first-line treatment for AL. We aimed to identify any potential adverse effects of a neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy (CT) or radiochemotherapy (RCT)) on EVAC.

    Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at our tertiary centre between 2013 and 2024. All patients who underwent EVAC for AL after oesophagectomy were included in this study. Parameters such as success rate, length of therapy, number of sponges needed, changes in treatment, and survival were analysed.

    Results: A total of 29 patients were included, 19 of whom received CT/RCT and 10 of whom received no neoadjuvant treatment (NT). There was no significant difference in patient survival (30-day survival rate CT/RCT n = 1 (5.3%) vs. NT n = 1 (10%), p = 0.632), success rate (CT/RCT n = 15 (78.9%) vs. NT n = 9 (90%), p = 0.454), and length of therapy (CT/RCT vs. NT 24.11 vs. 23.8, p = 0.681), the number of sponges required (CT/RCT vs. NT 6.26 vs. 6.6, p = 0.835), and the need for changing treatment (CT/RCT n = 5 (26.3%) vs. NT n = 1 (10%), p = 0.303).

    Conclusions: NT did not affect the success rate or length of therapy. Thus, we found no significant influence of CT/RCT on EVAC for AL after oesophagectomy.

    Keywords: EVAC; anastomotic leakage; chemoradiation; chemotherapy; endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure; neoadjuvant therapy; oesophageal cancer; oesophagectomy.

    Keywords:neoadjuvant therapy; anastomotic leakage; oesophagectomy

    背景: 吻合口漏(AL)是食管切除术后的一种令人担忧的并发症。内镜真空辅助闭合疗法(EVAC)已被越来越多地用作治疗 AL 的一线方法。我们旨在识别新辅助治疗(化疗 (CT) 或放疗联合化疗 (RCT))对 EVAC 可能产生的任何潜在不良影响。

    方法: 我们在 2013 年至 2024 年期间在我们的三级中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。所有因食管切除术后 AL 接受 EVAC 治疗的患者均纳入本研究。分析了成功几率、治疗长度、所需海绵数量、治疗变化以及生存率等参数。

    结果: 共有 29 名患者被纳入,其中 19 名接受了 CT/RCT,而 10 名未接受新辅助治疗 (NT)。患者生存情况(30 天存活率 CT/RCT n = 1 (5.3%) vs NT n = 1 (10%), p = 0.632)、成功率(CT/RCT n = 15 (78.9%) vs NT n = 9 (90%), p = 0.454)、治疗长度(CT/RCT 对比 NT 为 24.11 天和 23.8 天,p = 0.681)、所需海绵数量(CT/RCT 对比 NT 为 6.26 和 6.6,p = 0.835)以及治疗变更需求(CT/RCT n = 5 (26.3%) vs NT n = 1 (10%), p = 0.303)均无显著差异。

    结论: 新辅助治疗对 EVAC 的成功率或治疗长度没有影响。因此,我们未发现 CT/RCT 对食管切除术后 AL 中的 EVAC 存在显著的影响。

    关键词: EVAC;吻合口漏;放疗联合化疗;化疗;内镜真空辅助闭合疗法;新辅助治疗;食道癌;食管切除术。

    关键词:新辅助治疗; 吻合口漏; 食管切除术

    翻译效果不满意? 用Ai改进或 寻求AI助手帮助 ,对摘要进行重点提炼
    Copyright © Cancers. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Cancers

    缩写:CANCERS

    ISSN:N/A

    e-ISSN:2072-6694

    IF/分区:4.4/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Endoluminal Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy (EVAC) for Anastomotic Leakage After Oesophagectomy