首页 正文

International journal for equity in health. 2024 Feb 27;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02125-3 Q14.12024

Rural‒urban disparities in household catastrophic health expenditure in Bangladesh: a multivariate decomposition analysis

孟加拉国城乡家庭灾难性卫生支出差异:多元分解分析 翻译改进

Taslima Rahman  1  2, Dominic Gasbarro  3, Khorshed Alam  4, Khurshid Alam  3

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Murdoch Business School, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia. Taslima.Rahman@murdoch.edu.au.
  • 2 Institute of Health Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh. Taslima.Rahman@murdoch.edu.au.
  • 3 Murdoch Business School, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia.
  • 4 School of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia.
  • DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02125-3 PMID: 38413959

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Background: Rural‒urban disparity in catastrophic healthcare expenditure (CHE) is a well-documented challenge in low- and middle-income countries, including Bangladesh, limiting financial protection and hindering the achievement of the Universal Health Coverage target of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. However, the factors driving this divide remain poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to identify the key determinants of the rural‒urban disparity in CHE incidence in Bangladesh and their changes over time.

    Methods: We used nationally representative data from the latest three rounds of the Bangladesh Household Income and Expenditure Survey (2005, 2010, and 2016). CHE incidence among households seeking healthcare was measured using the normative food, housing, and utilities method. To quantify covariate contributions to the rural‒urban CHE gap, we employed the Oaxaca-Blinder multivariate decomposition approach, adapted by Powers et al. for nonlinear response models.

    Results: CHE incidence among rural households increased persistently during the study period (2005: 24.85%, 2010: 25.74%, 2016: 27.91%) along with a significant (p-value ≤ 0.01) rural‒urban gap (2005: 9.74%-points, 2010: 13.94%-points, 2016: 12.90%-points). Despite declining over time, substantial proportions of CHE disparities (2005: 87.93%, 2010: 60.44%, 2016: 61.33%) are significantly (p-value ≤ 0.01) attributable to endowment differences between rural and urban households. The leading (three) covariate categories consistently contributing significantly (p-value ≤ 0.01) to the CHE gaps were composition disparities in the lowest consumption quintile (2005: 49.82%, 2010: 36.16%, 2016: 33.61%), highest consumption quintile (2005: 32.35%, 2010: 15.32%, 2016: 18.39%), and exclusive reliance on informal healthcare sources (2005: -36.46%, 2010: -10.17%, 2016: -12.58%). Distinctively, the presence of chronic illnesses in households emerged as a significant factor in 2016 (9.14%, p-value ≤ 0.01), superseding the contributions of composition differences in household heads with no education (4.40%, p-value ≤ 0.01) and secondary or higher education (7.44%, p-value ≤ 0.01), which were the fourth and fifth significant contributors in 2005 and 2010.

    Conclusions: Rural‒urban differences in household economic status, educational attainment of household heads, and healthcare sources were the key contributors to the rural‒urban CHE disparity between 2005 and 2016 in Bangladesh, with chronic illness emerging as a significant factor in the latest period. Closing the rural‒urban CHE gap necessitates strategies that carefully address rural‒urban variations in the characteristics identified above.

    Keywords: Bangladesh; Financial hardship; Health expenditures; Healthcare disparities; Low and middle income countries; Rural health services; Sustainable development goals; Universal health care.

    Keywords:rural-urban disparities

    Copyright © International journal for equity in health. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:International journal for equity in health

    缩写:

    ISSN:N/A

    e-ISSN:1475-9276

    IF/分区:4.1/Q1

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Rural‒urban disparities in household catastrophic health expenditure in Bangladesh: a multivariate decomposition analysis