首页 正文

Review Chemosphere. 2023 Sep:336:139235. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139235 Q18.12024

The potential and sustainable strategy for swine wastewater treatment: Resource recovery

生猪污水处理的潜在及可持续战略:资源回收 翻译改进

Heng Wu  1, Anjie Li  2, Huaiwen Zhang  3, Sicong Gao  4, Suqi Li  5, Jindou Cai  6, Ruixiao Yan  4, Zhilin Xing  7

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, PR China. Electronic address: wuhengdyx@163.com.
  • 2 College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, PR China.
  • 3 College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, PR China.
  • 4 College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, PR China.
  • 5 College of Life and Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, PR China.
  • 6 School of Culture and Tourism, Chongqing City Management College, Chongqing, 402160, PR China.
  • 7 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, 400054, PR China. Electronic address: xingzhilin@cqut.edu.cn.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139235 PMID: 37343397

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Swine wastewater is highly polluted with complex and harmful substances that require effective treatment to minimize environmental damage. There are three commonly used biological technologies for treating swine wastewater: conventional biological technology (CBT), microbial electrochemical technology (MET), and microalgae technology (MT). However, there is a lack of comparison among these technologies and a lack of understanding of their unique advantages and efficient operation strategies. This review aims to compare and contrast the characteristics, influencing factors, improvement methods, and microbial mechanisms of each technology. CBT is cost-effective but has low resource recovery efficiency, while MET and MT have the highest potential for resource recovery. However, all three technologies are affected by various factors and toxic substances such as heavy metals and antibiotics. Improved methods include exogenous/endogenous enhancement, series reactor operation, algal-bacterial symbiosis system construction, etc. Though MET is limited by construction costs, CBT and MT have practical applications. While swine wastewater treatment processes have developed automatic control systems, the application need further promotion. Furthermore, key functional microorganisms involved in CBT's pollutant removal or transformation have been detected, as have related genes. The unique electroactive microbial cooperation mode and symbiotic mode of MET and MT were also revealed, respectively. Importantly, the future research should focus on broadening the scope and scale of engineering applications, preventing and controlling emerging pollutants, improving automated management level, focusing on microbial synergistic metabolism, enhancing resource recovery performance, and building a circular economy based on low-cost and resource utilization.

    Keywords: Biological treatment technology; Cost comparison; Microbial mechanism; Resource recovery; Swine wastewater.

    Keywords:swine wastewater treatment; resource recovery

    Copyright © Chemosphere. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Chemosphere

    缩写:CHEMOSPHERE

    ISSN:0045-6535

    e-ISSN:1879-1298

    IF/分区:8.1/Q1

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    The potential and sustainable strategy for swine wastewater treatment: Resource recovery