首页 正文

Review Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):10407-10420. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07433-4 Q13.02025

Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

癌症患者的直接口服抗凝剂用于静脉血栓栓塞的系统评价和网状Meta分析 翻译改进

Shuyi Wu  1, Meina Lv  1, Jiana Chen  1, Shaojun Jiang  1, Mingrong Chen  1, Zongwei Fang  1, Zhiwei Zeng  1, Jiafen Qian  1, Wenlin Xu  1, Chengfu Guan  1, Jinhua Zhang  2

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, #111 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
  • 2 Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, #111 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China. pollyzhang2006@126.com.
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07433-4 PMID: 36318341

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Background: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear.

    Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

    Results: We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8).

    Conclusions: For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.

    Keywords: Cancer; Direct oral anticoagulant; Network meta-analysis; Venous thromboembolism.

    Keywords:direct oral anticoagulants; venous thromboembolism; cancer patients; systematic review; network meta-analysis

    Copyright © Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Supportive care in cancer

    缩写:SUPPORT CARE CANCER

    ISSN:0941-4355

    e-ISSN:1433-7339

    IF/分区:3.0/Q1

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis