首页 正文

Randomized Controlled Trial Medicine. 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26642. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026642 Q21.42025

Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars

比较微激光磨削、点阵剥脱模式及联合模式Er:YAG激光治疗凹陷性痤疮瘢痕的疗效 翻译改进

Lei Chen  1, Yanjin Wang  2, Lili Jiang  3, Jing Fang  1, Jizhen Ren  2

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.
  • 2 The Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery.
  • 3 Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shangdong Province, China.
  • DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026642 PMID: 34260562

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Objective: To compare and analyze the effects of Er:YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peeling, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars.

    Method: Ninety patients of concavity acne scar were randomly assigned to three different groups:microlaserpeeling mode group (MM group), fractional ablative mode group (FM group) and combined mode group (CM group). MM group received microlaserpeeling mode with depth of 60 μm and a repetition rate of 20%, FM group received fractional ablative mode with depth of 300 μm and a fractional density of 8%, and CM group received a fractional depth of 200 μm, density of 8%, and a peeling depth of 30 μm, repetition rate of 20%. All patients were evaluated for their treatment effects and side effects 30 days after treatment, including the treatment satisfaction, the ECCA grading scale, pain score and pigmentation level.

    Results: According to the effect satisfaction of patients' self-assessment, the difference among the three groups was statistically significant (P < .05), the CM group was better than the other two groups, but there was no significant difference between the FM group and the MM group (P > .05). About the ECCA grading scale 30 days after treatment, the statistical result among the three groups was significant (P < .05), the CM group is much lower than the FM group which is approximately equal to the MM group. There was statistical difference in pain score among the three groups and every two groups (P < .05), the CM group had the highest pain score, while FM group had the lowest. About the pigmentation level, there was statistical difference among the three groups (P < .05), FM group had the lightest pigmentation, while the CM group had the heaviest.

    Conclusions: Three treatment modes are all effective in treating the concavity acne scar. Among the three modes, CM group is best effective, also accompanied with the most severe side effect; FM group achieves the best balance between treatment effect and side effect. The treatment practices indicate that when the Er:YAG laser with a wavelength of 2940 nm is used to treat concavity acne scars, the right treatment mode should be subject to the severity of the scar.

    Keywords:Er:yag laser; acne scars; microlaser peel

    Copyright © Medicine. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:Medicine

    缩写:MEDICINE

    ISSN:0025-7974

    e-ISSN:1536-5964

    IF/分区:1.4/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars