Background: To compare clinical effect between Er: YAG and CO2 laser in treatment of oral tumorous lesions.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted from 2000 to 2019. The quality assessment was performed by the QUADAS-2 tool (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011). The clinical value of comparison between Er: YAG and CO2 laser was evaluated by using the pooled estimate of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, sensitivity analysis and bias analysis were applied to ensure the accuracy of the results.

Results: Finally, 268 patients were enrolled in 6 studies and ultimately met the eligibility criteria. The Er: YAG and CO2 groups were 141 and 127, respectively. The meta-analysis showed significant difference in success (risk ratio = 21.29, 95% confidence interval [1.09, 1.52], P = .002; P for Heterogeneity = .99, I = 0%) and time of surgery ((P of heterogeneity = .29, I = 20%, Z = 25.69, P of over effect < .00001). The recurrence and complications of CO2and Er: YAG groups had no difference.

Conclusion: Er: YAG laser had better effects than CO2 laser in eliminating oral tumorous lesions while it needed longer operation time than CO2 laser.