BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2018 Apr 30:361:k1897. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1897 Q142.72025

Trump administration could reject decades of landmark health studies under "transparency" rule

美国特朗普政府可能以“透明度”之名废除数十年来的卫生研究里程碑成果 翻译改进

作者单位 +展开

DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1897 PMID: 29712646

摘要 中英对照阅读

Copyright © BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 中文内容为AI机器翻译，仅供参考！

相关内容

• The perils posed by the US Environmental Protection Agency's transparency rule

  美国环境保护局透明度法规带来的危害

  George D Thurston

  The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2018 Aug;6(8):e40-e41.

• Controversial new transparency rule proposed by US Environmental Protection Agency

  美国环保局提议一项争议性的新透明度规定

  Talha Khan Burki

  The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2020 Jun;8(6):549-550.

• Justification for the EPA's transparency rule

  有关美国环保署透明度规定的说明规则

  Peter Wood

  Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):181.

• A Proposed New Rule at the US EPA Is Transparency Taken Too Far

  美国 EPA(美国环保署)提议的新规定是透明度过度了吗？

  Cell Press Editorial Team

  Cell. 2020 Jan 9;180(1):1.

• Beware: transparency rule is a Trojan Horse

  当心：透明度规定是潘多拉盒子

  Naomi Oreskes

  Nature. 2018 May;557(7706):469.

• The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Proposed Transparency Rule Threatens Health

  美国环保署的拟议透明度法规威胁到健康防护

  Renee N Salas et al.

  Annals of internal medicine. 2019 Feb 5;170(3):197-198.

• The Environmental Protection Agency's "Strengthening Transparency in Pivotal Science" Rule: Don't Let History Repeat Itself

  勿让历史重演：关于美国环保署《巩固关键科学的透明度》规则的意见

  Gillian C Goobie

  Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2021 Oct;18(10):1614-1617.

• EPA's proposed transparency rule: Factors to consider, many; planets to live on, one

  关于美国环保局拟议的透明度法规需要考虑的因素很多；但可供居住的星球只有一个

  David B Allison

  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2020 Mar 10;117(10):5084-5087.