首页 正文

Review International journal of cardiology. 2015:189:211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.079 Q23.22024

Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: An updated meta-analysis of cohort studies

臂间收缩压差异与全因及心血管死亡率关联的荟萃分析:队列研究的最新汇总分析结果 翻译改进

Kaiwu Cao  1, Jingsong Xu  2, Qing Shangguan  3, Weitong Hu  4, Ping Li  5, Xiaoshu Cheng  6, Hai Su  7

作者单位 +展开

作者单位

  • 1 Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: 183580422@qq.com.
  • 2 Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: xujingsong@medmail.com.cn.
  • 3 Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: 1045383065@qq.com.
  • 4 Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: huweitong2010@sina.com.
  • 5 Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: lipingsydney@163.com.
  • 6 Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: xiaoshumenfan@126.com.
  • 7 Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: suyihappy@sohu.com.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.079 PMID: 25897908

    摘要 Ai翻译

    Objective: To evaluate whether an association exists between an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (sIAD) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

    Methods: We searched for cohort studies that evaluated the association of a sIAD and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in the electronic databases Medline/PubMed and Embase (August 2014). Random effects models were used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

    Results: Nine cohort studies (4 prospective and 5 retrospective) enrolling 15,617 participants were included. The pooled HR of all-cause mortality for a sIAD of ≥ 10 mm Hg was 1.53 (95% CI 1.14-2.06), and that for a sIAD of ≥ 15 mm Hg was 1.46 (1.13-1.88). Pooled HRs of cardiovascular mortality were 2.21 (95% CI 1.52-3.21) for a sIAD of ≥ 10mm Hg, and 1.89 (1.32-2.69) for a sIAD of ≥ 15 mm Hg. In the patient-based cohorts including hospital- and diabetes-based cohorts, both sIADs of ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 mm Hg were associated with increased all-cause (pooled HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01-3.78 and 1.59, 1.06-2.38, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (pooled HR 2.98, 95% CI 1.88-4.72 and 2.10, 1.07-4.13, respectively). In the community-based cohorts, however, only a sIAD of ≥ 15 mm Hg was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (pooled HR 1.94, 95 % CI 1.12-3.35).

    Conclusions: In the patient populations, a sIAD of ≥ 10 or of ≥ 15 mm Hg could be a useful indictor for increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and a sIAD of ≥ 15 mm Hg might help to predict increased cardiovascular mortality in the community populations.

    Keywords: All-cause mortality; Cardiovascular mortality; Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference; Meta-analysis.

    Keywords:all-cause mortality; cardiovascular mortality

    Copyright © International journal of cardiology. 中文内容为AI机器翻译,仅供参考!

    相关内容

    期刊名:International journal of cardiology

    缩写:INT J CARDIOL

    ISSN:0167-5273

    e-ISSN:1874-1754

    IF/分区:3.2/Q2

    文章目录 更多期刊信息

    全文链接
    引文链接
    复制
    已复制!
    推荐内容
    Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: An updated meta-analysis of cohort studies